Browsing by Author "Gugamsetty, Balakrishnaiah"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item type:Item, Differences in 24-h average PM2.5 concentrations between the beta attenuation monitor (BAM) and the dichotomous sampler (Dichot)(2013-08-01) ;Liu, Chun-Nan ;Awasthi, Amit ;Hung, Yi-Hung ;Gugamsetty, BalakrishnaiahTsai, Chuen-JinnIn this study, PM2.5 concentrations were measured simultaneously by a Dichotomous sampler (Dichot, Model SA241, Andersen Inc., Georgia, USA) (PM2.5,D) and a beta attenuation monitor (BAM) (PM2.5,B) at each of three air monitoring stations in Taiwan. Results show that PM2.5,B concentrations measured by the VEREWA-F701 BAM (without federal equivalent method (FEM) designation) are consistently higher than PM2.5,D concentrations by 58.4 37.4% at Jhongshan station, while less overestimation exists at Sinjhuang and judong stations, which is 29.8 +/- 20.2 and 28.4 +/- 19.0%, respectively, where the earlier version of the Met-One BAM-1020s (without FEM designation) are used. Different factors influencing the overestimation, which include aerosol water content, volatilization of inorganic species and positive artifacts due to acid gas adsorption by the glass fiber filter tapes were studied for the BAM-1020. Results show that the overestimation is mainly caused by the positive artifacts due to acid gas adsorption by the glass fiber filter tapes used in the BAM-1020. Aerosol water content and volatilization loss of inorganic semi-volatile species are found to be less important to the overestimation. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Item type:Item, Source Characterization and Apportionment of PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.1 by Using Positive Matrix Factorization(2012-08-01) ;Gugamsetty, Balakrishnaiah ;Wei, Han ;Liu, Chun-Nan ;Awasthi, AmitHsu, Shih-ChiehAmbient Particulate Matters (PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.1) were investigated at Shinjung station in New Taipei City, Taiwan. Samples were collected simultaneously using a dichotomous sampler (Andersen Model SA-241) and a MOUDI (MSP Model 110) over a 24-h period from May 2011 to November 2011 at Shinjung station. Samples were analyzed for metallic trace elements using ion coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) and ionic compounds by ion chromatography (IC). The average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.1 were found to be 39.45 +/- 11.58, 21.82 +/- 7.50 and 1.42 +/- 0.56 mu g/m(3), respectively. Based on the chemical information, positive matrix factorization (PMF) was used to identify PM sources. A total of five source types were identified, including soil dust, vehicle emissions, sea salt, industrial emissions and secondary aerosols, and their contributions were estimated using PMF. The crustal enrichment factors (EF) were calculated using Al as a reference for the trace metal species to identify the sources. Conditional probability functions (CPF) were computed using wind profiles and factor contributions. The results of CPF analysis were used to identify local point sources. The results suggest a competitive relationship between anthropogenic and natural source processes over the monitoring station.Item type:Item, "Source Characterization and Apportionment of PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.1 by Using Positive Matrix Factorization"(2012-08-01) ;Gugamsetty, Balakrishnaiah ;Wei, Han ;Liu, Chun-Nan ;Awasthi, AmitHsu, Shih-Chieh"Ambient Particulate Matters (PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.1) were investigated at Shinjung station in New Taipei City, Taiwan. Samples were collected simultaneously using a dichotomous sampler (Andersen Model SA-241) and a MOUDI (MSP Model 110) over a 24-h period from May 2011 to November 2011 at Shinjung station. Samples were analyzed for metallic trace elements using ion coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) and ionic compounds by ion chromatography (IC). The average concentrations of PM10, PM2.5 and PM0.1 were found to be 39.45 +/- 11.58, 21.82 +/- 7.50 and 1.42 +/- 0.56 mu g/m(3), respectively. Based on the chemical information, positive matrix factorization (PMF) was used to identify PM sources. A total of five source types were identified, including soil dust, vehicle emissions, sea salt, industrial emissions and secondary aerosols, and their contributions were estimated using PMF. The crustal enrichment factors (EF) were calculated using Al as a reference for the trace metal species to identify the sources. Conditional probability functions (CPF) were computed using wind profiles and factor contributions. The results of CPF analysis were used to identify local point sources. The results suggest a competitive relationship between anthropogenic and natural source processes over the monitoring station."