Browsing by Author "Lee, Pin-Shen"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item type:Item, Inter Partes Review: Patent Killer No More?(2019-07-01) ;Chen, Feng-Chi ;Lee, Pin-Shen ;科技法律學院College of LawInter Partes review (IPR) can efficiently invalidate drug patents and potentially convey strategic advantages to follow-on drug makers. However, recent changes in the IPR system foretell a tectonic shift in the landscape. Here we summarize these major changes and discuss the implications for the biopharmaceutical community.Item type:Item, Interactions between Inter Partes Review and Hatch-Waxman Litigations(2019-01-01) ;Chen, Feng-Chi ;Lee, Pin-Shen ;Huang, Yun-Yu ;Wu, Huang-ChiLin, Hsuan-YuGeneric drug development in the United States is governed by the Hatch-Waxman Act (HWA), which sets forth the "patent linkage" system requiring resolution of patent disputes before a generic drug can be approved for marketing. The emergence of Inter Partes Review (IPR), an effective administrative proceeding to weed out low-quality patents, is believed by some to have endangered the HWA balance between brand-name and generic drug makers. Here we describe an empirical analysis profiling the influences of IPR on patent linkage. Our results indicate that fewer than 10% of the HWA-litigated patents are subject to parallel IPR challenges. Importantly, IPR yields a slightly higher claim invalidation rate but a much lower settlement rate than court litigations, which may not benefit generic drug makers. Furthermore, IPR is employed by non-first generic drug makers, presumably to break into the market occupied by brand-name and the first generic makers. Overall, IPR seems not to play a dominant role, but to serve strategic functions in HWA disputes.