Browsing by Author "Liao, Min-Tsun"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item type:Item, Agreement Between Automated and Human Measurements of Heart Rate in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation(2018-09-01) ;Lin, Ting-Tse ;Wang, Chia-Ling ;Liao, Min-Tsun ;Lai, Chao-Lun分子醫學與生物工程研究所Background: The accuracy of heart rate (HR) measurement by automated blood pressure monitors in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. The authors investigate the agreement between HR measurements by 2 automated devices and human counting in patients with AF. Methods: In 47 patients with persistent AF, HR was recorded using 2 automated blood pressure monitors: Omron M5-I and Microlife BPA100 Plus. Human counting of HR by a stethoscope was used as the reference. For each method, 3 readings were made and the mean was calculated for comparison. In addition to Wilcoxon signed rank test, the correlation between HR measurements by automated devices and human counting was determined using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r), and the agreement between HR measurements by both devices and human counting was validated by the Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Overall, we found no significant difference in HR measurements between devices and human counting (Omron vs human counting, 81.1 +/- 11.1 vs 80.2 +/- 10.8 beats per minute [bpm]; P = .21, r = 0.911; ICC, 0.954; Microlife vs human counting, 81.3 +/- 10.8 vs 80.2 +/- 10.8 bpm; P = .22, r = 0.842; ICC, 0.912). However, in patients with HR greater than 80 bpm, the HR measured by the Microlife device was significantly higher than that measured by human counting (91.1 +/- 5.2 vs 87.1 +/- 8.6 bpm, P = .034). Conclusion: There was a high agreement between HR measurements by 2 automated devices and human counting, but the Microlife device may overestimate HR in AF patients with HR greater than 80 bpm.Item type:Item, Primary prevention of myocardial infarction with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients with rheumatoid arthritis - A nationwide cohort study(2017-12-07) ;Lin, Ting-Tse ;Wu, Cho-Kai ;Liao, Min-Tsun ;Yang, Yao-HsuChen, Pau-ChungBackground Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is regarded as a high risk factor for myocardial infarction. Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor contributing to increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI). Dual blood pressure (BP)-lowering and anti-inflammatory effect of renin-angiotensinsystem (RAS) inhibitors may possess protective effect from MI in RA population. However, treatment of hypertension with RAS inhibitors and MI in RA population remains unclear. Methods We investigated whether RAS blockade could decrease risk of incident MI in hypertensive patients with RA. We identified patients with RA and hypertension from the Registry for Catastrophic Illness, a nation-wide database encompassing almost all of the RA patients in Taiwan from 1995 to 2008. The primary endpoint was MI and the median duration of follow up was 2,986 days. Propensity score weighting and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios for MI. Results Among 27,335 subjects, 9.9% received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), 25.9% received angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) and 20.0% received ACEIs or ARBs alternatively. The incidence of MI significantly decreased in patients treated with ACEIs (hazard ratio 0.707; 95% confidence interval 0.595 - 0.840), ARBs (0.641; 0.550 - 0.747) and ACEIs/ARBs (0.631; 0.539 - 0.739). The protective effect of ACEI or ARB therapy was significantly better in patients taking longer duration. The effect remained robust in subgroup analyses. Conclusions Therapy of ACEIs or ARBs is associated with a lower risk of MI among patients with RA. Hence, hypertension in patients with RA could comprise a compelling indication for RAS inhibitors.