Browsing by Author "Lin, Y. -J."
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item type:Item, A true-direction reconstruction of the quiet direct simulation method for inviscid gas flows(2013-11-01) ;Lin, Y. -J. ;Smith, M. R. ;Kuo, F. -A. ;Cave, H. M.Huang, J. -C.In this paper, a true-direction flux reconstruction of the second-order quiet direct simulation (QDS-2N) Smith et al. (2009)[3] as an equivalent Euler equation solver, called QDS-N-2, is proposed. Because of the true-directional nature of QDS, where volume-to-volume (true-direction) fluxes are computed, as opposed to fluxes at cell interfaces as employed by traditional finite volume schemes, a volumetric reconstruction is required to reach a totally true-direction scheme. The conserved quantities are permitted to vary (according to a polynomial expression) across all simulated dimensions. Prior to the flux computation, QDS particles are introduced using properties based on weighted moments taken over the polynomial reconstruction of the conserved quantity fields. The resulting flux expressions are shown to exactly reproduce the existing second-order extension for a one-dimensional flow, while providing a means for true multi-dimensional reconstruction. The new reconstruction is demonstrated in several verification studies. These include a shock-bubble interaction problem, an Euler-four-shock interaction problem, and the advection of a vortical disturbance. These results are presented, and the increased computation time and the effect of higher-order extension are discussed in this paper. The results show that the proposed multi-dimensional reconstruction provides a significant increase in the accuracy of the solution. We show that, despite the increase in the computational expense, the computational speed of the proposed QDS-N-2 method is several times higher than that of the previously proposed QDS-2N scheme for a fixed degree of numerical accuracy, at least, for the test problem of the advection of vertical disturbances. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.Item type:Item, General Higher Order Extension to the Quiet Direct Simulation Method(2011) ;Lin, Y. -J. ;Smith, M. R. ;Cave, H. M. ;Huang, J. -C.Wu, J. -S.Presented is the multi-dimensional extension of the Quiet Direct Simulation (QDS) method to general, higher order spatial accuracy. Due to the true directional nature of QDS, where volume-to-volume fluxes are computed as opposed to fluxes at cell interfaces, a volumetric reconstruction is required. In this approach, the conserved quantities are permitted to vary (according to a polynomial expression) across all simulated dimensions. Prior to flux computation, QDS particles are introduced using properties based on weighted moments taken over the polynomial reconstruction of conserved quantity fields. The resulting flux expressions are shown to exactly reproduce existing 2(nd) order extensions (for one-dimensional flows) while providing means for true multi-dimensional reconstruction and general higher order extensions. Here we will show a typical comparison among different spatial order extensions of QDS and other WENO (5(th) order accurate) based numerical scheme. The extension is demonstrated up to 5(th) order spatial accuracy and is shown to be comparable to or more accurate than the other higher order schemes.Item type:Item, Multi-Species Fluxes for the Parallel Quiet Direct Simulation (QDS) Method(2011-01-01) ;Cave, H. M. ;Lim, C. -W. ;Jermy, M. C. ;Krumdieck, S. P.Smith, M. R.Fluxes of multiple species are implemented in the Quiet Direct Simulation (QDS) scheme for gas flows. Each molecular species streams independently. All species are brought to local equilibrium at the end of each time step. The multi species scheme is compared to DSMC simulation, on a test case of a Mach 20 flow of a xenon/helium mixture over a forward facing step. Depletion of the heavier species in the bow shock and the near-wall layer are seen. The multi-species QDS code is then used to model the flow in a pulsed-pressure chemical vapour deposition reactor set up for carbon film deposition. The injected gas is a mixture of methane and hydrogen. The temporal development of the spatial distribution of methane over the substrate is tracked.