Browsing by Author "Liu, Yuan-Hao"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item type:Item, A penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer rupture in the ascending aorta with hemopericardium: a case report(2016-07-11) ;Liu, Yuan-Hao ;Ke, Hung-Yen ;Lin, Yi-Chang ;Tsai, Chien-Sung生物科技學系Background: Acute aortic syndrome, including classic aortic dissection, intramural aortic hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU), is a term used to describe a group of conditions with similar clinical symptoms, but with different pathophysiological mechanisms. PAU is a lesion that penetrates the internal elastic lamina through the media. It is usually located in the descending aorta and rarely observed in the ascending aorta. Case presentation: A 76-year-old man with a history of essential hypertension was brought to the emergency department (ED) because of a sudden-onset chest pain at rest. He had not been taking his medication as ordered. His vital signs in the ED were a blood pressure of 82/60 mmHg, heart rate of 158 beats per min, respiratory rate of 22 breaths per min, and a body temperature of 37.2 degrees C. An electrocardiogram did not show an ST segment elevation, and cardiac enzymes were within normal limits. No widening mediastinum was found on chest radiography, but a large pericardial effusion with an impending cardiac tamponade was revealed on echocardiography. The diagnosis of PAU rupture in the ascending aorta with hemopericardium was made with chest computed tomography. An emergent sternotomy and ascending aorta reconstruction were performed. A ruptured ulcerative plaque through the intima to the adventitia without flap dissection in the ascending aorta was confirmed. The patient was discharged 18 days after the operation. Conclusions: Although PAU in the ascending aorta is uncommon, it is commonly lethal when it ruptures. With the current advances in endovascular techniques and devices, endovascular repair of PAU in the ascending aorta is currently recommended only for high-risk patients unsuitable for open repair. However, we anticipate that endovascular repair may become feasible in patients with PAU in the ascending aorta in the future.Item type:Item, A Rare Experience of Infective Residual Sheath in the Wall of the Innominate Vein after Extraction of Implantable-Defibrillators(2017-07-01) ;Liu, Yuan-Hao ;Lin, Wei-Shiang ;Lin, Yi-Chang ;Lin, Chih-YuanTsai, Chien-SungBackground: Cardiac device-related infective endocarditis is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication. Therefore, cardiac devices should be removed as soon as a device-related infection is suspected. Case Report: A 56-year-old male with a history of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) 7 years earlier and re-implantation of ICDs due to dysfunction 18 months ago presented with erosion of the ICD pocket with Pseudomonas bacteremia. For the past year, only multiple wound debridements were performed. Accordingly, we performed debridement and removal of the generator during this admission; however, bacteremia still persisted. Using transesophageal echocardiography, we detected vegetation on the pacing leads and tricuspid valve in the right atrium. We performed thoracotomy with tricuspid valve repair and pacing wire removal. However, anterior chest pain and refractory bacteremia occurred 3 months later after discharge, and an infectious foreign body in the wall of the innominate vein was detected using chest computer tomography. Thoracotomy was again performed for resection of the innominate vein with the infection source. Postoperative recovery was good, with no systemic infection or bacteremia. Conclusions: Pacing lead extraction is a common procedure following cardiac rhythm management device-related infection. However, residual foreign body-related bacteremia should be suspected in cases with fever of unknown origin after primary surgery. Preserving the innominate vein with patch repair is a feasible option. However, a postoperative 4-week course of antibiotics is recommended.