Browsing by Author "Marechal, Francois"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item type:Item, Power-to-fuels via solid-oxide electrolyzer: Operating window and techno-economics(2019-08-01) ;Wang, Ligang ;Chen, Ming ;Kungas, Rainer ;Lin, Tzu-EnDiethelm, StefanPower-to-fuel systems via solid-oxide electrolysis are promising for storing excess renewable electricity by efficient electrolysis of steam (or co-electrolysis of steam and CO2) into hydrogen (or syngas), which can be further converted into synthetic fuels with plant-wise thermal integration. Electrolysis stack performance and durability determine the system design, performance, and long-term operating strategy; thus, solid-oxide electrolyzer based power-to-fuels were investigated from the stack to system levels. At the stack level, the data from a 6000-h stack testing under laboratory isothermal conditions were used to calibrate a quasi-2D model, which enables to predict practical, isothermal stack performance with reasonable accuracy. Feasible stack operating windows meeting various design specifications (e.g., specific syngas composition) were further generated to support the selection of operating points. At the system level, with the chosen similar stack operating points, various power-to-fuel systems, including power-to-hydrogen, power-to-methane, power-to-methanol (dimethyl ether) and power-to-gasoline, were compared techno-economically considering system-level heat integration. Several operating strategies of the stack were compared to address the increase in stack temperature due to degradation. The modeling results show that the system efficiency for producing H-2, methane, methanol/dimethyl ether and gasoline decreases sequentially from 94% (power-to-H-2) to 64% (power-to-gasoline), based on a higher heating value. Co-electrolysis, which allows better heat integration, can improve the efficiency of the systems with less exothermic fuel-synthesis processes (e.g., methanol/dimethyl ether) but offers limited advantages for power-tomethane and power-to-gasoline systems. In a likely future scenario, where the growing amount of electricity from renewable sources results in increasing periods of a negative electricity price, solid oxide electrolyser based power-to-fuel systems are highly suitable for levelling the price fluctuations in an economic way.Item type:Item, Power-to-methane via co-electrolysis of H2O and CO2: The effects of pressurized operation and internal methanation(2019-09-15) ;Wang, Ligang ;Rao, Megha ;Diethelm, Stefan ;Lin, Tzu-EnZhang, HanfeiThis paper presents a model-based investigation to handle the fundamental issues for the design of co-electrolysis based power-to-methane at the levels of both the stack and system: the role of CO2 in co-electrolysis, the benefits of employing pressurized stack operation and the conditions of promoting internal methanation. Results show that the electrochemical reaction of co-electrolysis is dominated by H2O splitting while CO2 is converted via reverse water-gas shift reaction. Increasing CO2 feed fraction mainly enlarges the concentration and cathode-activation overpotentials. Internal methanation in the stack can be effectively promoted by pressurized operation under high reactant utilization with low current density and large stack cooling. For the operation of a single stack, methane fraction of dry gas at the cathode outlet can reach as high as 30 vol.% (at 30 bar and high flowrate of sweep gas), which is, unfortunately, not preferred for enhancing system efficiency due to the penalty from the pressurization of sweep gas. The number drops down to 15 vol.% (at 15 bar) to achieve the highest system efficiency (at 0.27 A/cm(2)). The internal methanation can serve as an effective internal heat source to maintain stack temperature (thus enhancing electrochemistry), particularly at a small current density. This enables the co-electrolysis based power-to-methane to.achieve higher efficiency than the steam-electrolysis based (90% vs 86% on higher heating value, or 83% vs 79% on lower heating value without heat and converter losses).Item type:Item, Reversible solid-oxide cell stack based power-to-x-to-power systems: Comparison of thermodynamic performance(2020-10-01) ;Wang, Ligang ;Zhang, Yumeng ;Perez-Fortes, Mar ;Aubin, PhilippeLin, Tzu-EnThe increasing penetration of variable renewable energies poses new challenges for grid management. The economic feasibility of grid-balancing plants may be limited by low annual operating hours if they work either only for power generation or only for power storage. This issue might be addressed by a dual-function power plant with power-to-x capability, which can produce electricity or store excess renewable electricity into chemicals at different periods. Such a plant can be uniquely enabled by a solid-oxide cell stack, which can switch between fuel cell and electrolysis with the same stack. This paper investigates the optimal conceptual design of this type of plant, represented by power-to-x-to-power process chains with x being hydrogen, syngas, methane, methanol and ammonia, concerning the efficiency (on a lower heating value) and power densities. The results show that an increase in current density leads to an increased oxygen flow rate and a decreased reactant utilization at the stack level for its thermal management, and an increased power density and a decreased efficiency at the system level. The power-generation efficiency is ranked as methane (65.9%), methanol (60.2%), ammonia (58.2%), hydrogen (58.3%), syngas (53.3%) at 0.4 A/cm(2), due to the benefit of heat-to-chemical-energy conversion by chemical reformulating and the deterioration of electrochemical performance by the dilution of hydrogen. The power-storage efficiency is ranked as syngas (80%), hydrogen (74%), methane (72%), methanol (68%), ammonia (66%) at 0.7 A/cm(2), mainly due to the benefit of co-electrolysis and the chemical energy loss occurring in the chemical synthesis reactions. The lost chemical energy improves plant-wise heat integration and compensates for its adverse effect on power-storage efficiency. Combining these efficiency numbers of the two modes results in a rank of round-trip efficiency: methane (47.5%) > syngas (43.3%) hydrogen (42.6%) > methanol (40.7%) > ammonia (38.6%). The pool of plant designs obtained lays the basis for the optimal deployment of this balancing technology for specific applications.