<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.cf390c6bfbe7555f.css"> Skip to main content

學術出版;;Publications

Permanent URI for this communityhdl:11536/1

收集所有交通大學研究人員與學生個人或團體所發表之各項學術著作,涵蓋期刊論文、教師專書、學位論文等項。;;Collections of Publications of NCTU Researchers and Students Like Journal Papers and Thesis.

Browse

🏛️國立陽明交通大學機構典藏

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item type:Item,
    Hepatitis B-related outcomes following direct-acting antiviral therapy in Taiwanese patients with chronic HBV/HCV co-infection
    (2020-07-01)
    Yeh, Ming-Lun
    ;
    Huang, Chung-Feng
    ;
    Huang, Ching-, I
    ;
    Holmes, Jacinta A.
    ;
    Hsieh, Meng-Hsuan
    dynamics of HBsAg and HBV virological reactivation, among patients coinfected with HCV receiving direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) remains unclear. Thus, we aimed to analyze HBV-related outcomes in these patients. Methods: Serial HBsAg and HBV DNA levels were measured in 79 HBV/HCV-coinfected patients receiving DAAs (13 receiving anti-HBV nucleot(s)ide analog [NUC] therapy simultaneously). The endpoints included HBsAg dynamics and seroclearance, HBV reactivation (HBV DNA >1 log increase or >100 IU/ml if undetectable at baseline) and HBV-related clinical reactivation. Results: HBsAg levels declined from a median of 73.3 IU/ml at baseline to 16.2 IU/ml at the end-of-DAA treatment and increased to 94.1 IU/ml at 12 months post-treatment. During a mean 11.1-months of follow-up, 8 (10.1%) patients experienced HBsAg seroclearance and 30 (38.0%) HBV reactivation (12-month cumulative incidence, 10.3% and 40.4%, respectively). Patients with pre-treatment HBsAg <= 10 IU/ml had a significantly higher rate of HBsAg seroclearance (hazard ratio [HR] 8.52; 95% CI 1.048-69.312) and lower risk of HBV reactivation than those with pre-treatment HBsAg >10 IU/ml (HR 2.88; 95% CI 1.057-7.844) in multivariate analyses. Six patients (4 cirrhotics) not receiving NUC therapy experienced HBV-related clinical reactivation; 3 of the 4 cirrhotics developed liver failure and 2 died despite immediate NUC therapy. Compared to untreated HBV-monoinfected patients, HBV/HCV-coinfected patients without NUC prophylaxis had a similar rate of HBsAg seroclearance, but a significantly higher risk of HBV reactivation following DAA therapy (HR 6.59; 95% CI 2.488-17.432). Conclusions: DAA-treated HBV/HCV-coinfected patients had significantly higher rates of HBV seroclearance, particularly among those with low pre-treatment HBsAg titer, but were at higher risk of HBV reactivation, particularly among those with higher pretreatment HBsAg titer. Prophylactic anti-HBV therapy is essential for cirrhotic patients, irrespective of baseline HBV DNA levels. Lay summary: We studied outcomes relating to hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients coinfected with both hepatitis B and C. Patients receiving direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C were more likely to experience seroclearance (or functional cure of HBV), but were also more likely to experience HBV reactivation, which can lead to hepatitis, liver failure and death. In coinfected cirrhotic patients being treated for HCV, prophylactic treatment for HBV is mandatory. (C) 2020 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V.
  • Item type:Item,
    APASL HCV guidelines of virus-eradicated patients by DAA on how to monitor HCC occurrence and HBV reactivation
    (2019-11-01)
    Kanda, Tatsuo
    ;
    Lau, George K. K.
    ;
    Wei, Lai
    ;
    Moriyama, Mitsuhiko
    ;
    Yu, Ming-Lung
    In the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, sustained virological response (SVR) is very high, but close attention must be paid to the possible occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with co-infection who achieved SVR in short term. HCC occurrence was more often observed in patients with previous HCC history. We found occurrence of HCC in 178 (29.6%) of 602 patients with previous HCC history (15.4 months mean follow-up post-DAA initiation) but, in contrast, in only 604 (1.3%) of 45,870 patients without previous HCC history (18.2 months mean follow-up). Thus, in these guidelines, we recommend the following: in patients with previous HCC history, surveillance at 4-month intervals for HCC by ultrasonography (US) and tumor markers should be performed. In patients without previous HCC history, surveillance at 6- to 12-month intervals for HCC including US is recommended until the long-term DAA treatment effects, especially for the resolution of liver fibrosis, are confirmed. This guideline also includes recommendations on how to follow-up patients who have been infected with both HCV and HBV. When HCV was eradicated in these HBsAg-positive patients or patients with previous HBV infection ( anti-HBc and/ or anti-HBs-positive), it was shown that HBV reactivation or HBV DNA reappearance was observed in 67 (41.4%) of 162 or 12 (0.9%) of 1317, respectively. For these co-infected patients, careful attention should be paid to HBV reactivation for 24 weeks post-treatment.
  • Item type:Item,
    Interference of hepatitis B virus dual infection in platelet count recovery in chronic hepatitis C patients with curative antiviral therapy
    (2018-05-01)
    Huang, Chung-Feng
    ;
    Yeh, Ming-Lun
    ;
    Huang, Ching-I
    ;
    Lin, Zu-Yau
    ;
    Chen, Shinn-Cherng
    Background and AimHepatitis C virus infection is associated with thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia recovers after viral eradication. The current study explored the rate and factors associated with platelet (PLT) recovery, which may represent the degree of liver fibrosis regression. MethodsA total of 466 patients who achieved a sustained virological response were enrolled to compare the PLT change after a mean follow-up period of 85.5months (range 12-163months). ResultsPlatelet counts increased significantly after achieving sustained virological response (from 16655x10(3) to 201 +/- 61x10(3)u/L, P<0.001). The median PLT count increment was 5.03x10(3)u/L per year. Logistic regression analysis revealed that factors associated with slow PLT count recovery were high pretreatment PLT counts (odds ratio [OR]/ 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.992/0.989-0.996, P<0.001) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection (OR/CI: 0.416/0.220-0.785, P=0.007). High PLT counts were the only factor associated with slow PLT recovery in patients with mild liver disease (F0-2) (OR/CI: 0.992/0.987-0.996, P<0.001). On the other hand, HBV co-infection was the only factor associated with slow PLT recovery in patients with advanced fibrosis (OR/CI: 0.207/0.054-0.789, P=0.02). Linear regression analysis of factors correlated to the delta PLT count change per year in patients with F0-2 included pretreatment white blood cell (: -0.001; CI: -0.002-0.000; P=0.01) and pretreatment PLT counts (: -0.037; CI: -0.061 to -0.013; P=0.003). HBsAg seropositivity was the only factor correlated to the delta PLT count change per year (: -10.193; CI: -16.752-3.635; P=0.003) among patients with F3-4. ConclusionsPlatelet counts recovered after hepatitis C virus eradication. HBV dual infection disrupted PLT count recovery, especially in CHC patients with advanced liver disease.