完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author施盈廷en_US
dc.contributor.authorYing-Ting Shihen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-22T08:01:08Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-22T08:01:08Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/123637-
dc.description.abstract本文嘗試以近代對科技的論述作引子,提問人們面對科技時所應採的立場,為解答此一疑問,我們回頭質問科技的本質為何,在此我們採用Heidegger的論點來說明科技之「流行觀念」與科技本質的差異。當Heidegger在論述科技本質是一種對人的強求時,他認為出路在於「有關存在的思想」,因此我們嘗試從存在主義尋找解答。西方存在主義所強調的是個人獨特存在,及真正存在的觀點,這或可闡明人們對物之論本來就不齊,因而得以用不齊齊之。但本文以為以「物論」本不齊,而齊「物論」,並未達致齊「物」的境界,因此,再援引莊子的<齊物論>來接續存在主義的觀點,希望藉<齊物論>再度展現出人與科技的另一種可能的聯繫方式,即「天地與我共生、萬物與我為一」,此境界在實踐上有其難度,但在心態上卻可供處於科技包圍之世界中的人們獲得反思的機會,若能促成反思,則本文目的即已達致。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBy introducing discussions about technologies in our modern time, we propose our question: what position human beings should take while they confront with technologies. To answer this question, we draw on Heidegger’s interrogation about the essence of technology and perspectives of Existentialism about how human beings exist to illuminate our further way. But we suggest arguments of Existentialism are merely the first step, we need a further step. That is the idea, “From seeing all discussions about things equal, the first step, toward seeing all things equal, the further step”, learned from “Discussion on Making All Thing Equal” of Chuang Tze.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWzh_TW
dc.subject莊子zh_TW
dc.subject齊物論zh_TW
dc.subject科技zh_TW
dc.subject存在主義zh_TW
dc.subject海德格爾zh_TW
dc.subjectChuang Tzuzh_TW
dc.subjectDiscussion on Making All Things Equalzh_TW
dc.subjectTechnologyzh_TW
dc.subjectExistentialismzh_TW
dc.subjectHeideggerzh_TW
dc.title科技與人:從「齊、物論」到「齊物、論」zh_TW
dc.titleTechnology and Human: From Seeing All Discussions about Things Equal toward Seeing all Things Equalen_US
dc.identifier.journal資訊社會研究zh_TW
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Cyber Culture and Information Societyen_US
dc.citation.volume5en_US
dc.citation.spage209en_US
dc.citation.epage233en_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Communication and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.department傳播與科技學系zh_TW
顯示於類別:資訊社會研究