Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTzeng, GHen_US
dc.contributor.authorTang, TIen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, YMen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, MLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:16:52Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:16:52Z-
dc.date.issued2006-04-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4456en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/12398-
dc.description.abstractThe bicycle industry is one of the most competitive industries in Taiwan. To construct multi-objective production and distribution models tor supply chain, following five methods are compared and discussed: (i) Multi-objective compromise programming; (ii) Fuzzy multi-objective programming (iii) Weighted multi-objective programming; (iv) Weighted fuzzy multi-objective programming; and (v) Two-phase fuzzy multi- objective programming. The weighted multi-objective model has been found better for considering the maximum profit for enterprises and the maximum quality for customer service. After raising the per-unit production cost in production processes, it was observed that the total profit would decrease in real empirical study. In addition, if the unit inventory cost increases due to improving the customer service level, then the total profit might increase, but not significantly.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectbicycle industryen_US
dc.subjectcustomer serviceen_US
dc.subjectmulti-objective programmingen_US
dc.subjectsupply chainen_US
dc.titleMultiple-objective planning for a production and distribution model of the supply chain: Case of a bicycle manufactureren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCHen_US
dc.citation.volume65en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.spage309en_US
dc.citation.epage320en_US
dc.contributor.department科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Management of Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000236741900003-
dc.citation.woscount3-
Appears in Collections:Articles