Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, Kuei-Huen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Yung-Chiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Yu-Tsaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-21T08:27:56Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-21T08:27:56Z-
dc.date.issued2014-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0219-6220en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219622014500758en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/124137-
dc.description.abstractFailure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is one of the risk analysis techniques recommended by international quality certification systems, such as ISO 9000, ISO/TS 16949, CE, and QS9000. Most current FMEA methods use the risk priority number (RPN) value to evaluate the risk of failure. The RPN value is the mathematical product of the three parameters of a failure mode that is rated between 1 and 10 in terms of its severity (S), occurrence (O), and detection (D), respectively. However, the RPN method has been found with three main drawbacks: (1) high duplicate RPN values, (2) failure to consider the ordered weights of S, O, and D, and (3) failure to consider the direct and indirect relationships between the failure modes and causes of failure. Therefore, this paper integrates the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) approach to rank the risk of failure. A case of an inlet plate ring that has been drawn from a professional mechanical factory is presented to further illustrate the proposed approach. After comparing the result that was obtained from the proposed method with the conventional RPN and DEMATEL methods, it was found that the proposed method can resolve the abovementioned RPN ranking issues and give a more appropriate risk assessment than other listed approaches to provide valuable information for the decision makers.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectFailure mode and effect analysisen_US
dc.subjectrisk priority numberen_US
dc.subjectTOPSISen_US
dc.subjectDEMATELen_US
dc.titleIntegrating TOPSIS and DEMATEL Methods to Rank the Risk of Failure of FMEAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1142/S0219622014500758en_US
dc.identifier.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKINGen_US
dc.citation.volume13en_US
dc.citation.spage1229en_US
dc.citation.epage1257en_US
dc.contributor.department工業工程與管理學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000346223300007en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles