完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorLin, Sunny S. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, H. Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChiang, Yu-Tzuen_US
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Guo-Hengen_US
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Shyan-Mingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-21T11:21:58Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-21T11:21:58Z-
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4799-4266-4en_US
dc.identifier.issnen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/U-MEDIA.2014.59en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/125115-
dc.description.abstractThe purposes of this study were two folds. First was to design three strategies to help elementary school children reading science expositories online with the supports of an annotation system. The "iRuns" strategies were proposed based on the SOI model of Reading expository text [1] to include (1)"underline" for selecting main ideas, (2)"annotation for connection" to organize important ideas and (3) "summary" for integrating multiple concepts. Then a field study was conducted to explore whether students efficiently adopted iRuns strategies and achieved comprehension on earth science materials. A total of 55 5th and 6th graders from an elementary school participated a 8-week reading club. A plug-in annotation system (COM2ANNO) developed by Huang et al. [2] was adopdeted. Students\' underlying, annotation and summary efficiencies were rated more favorable if they hit more main ideas. The results showed that iRuns strategy efficiencies decreased slightly across multiple time points and the high reading ability students\' three annotation efficiencies were always better than the low ones. The gaps of iRun strategy efficiencies between high and low reading ability groups was gradually getting closer through series of instruction. Low ability students\' strategy efficiencies correlated with comprehension score significantly but the high ones didn\'t. It indicated that low reading ability students benefited greatly from the iRuns strategies instruction. The annotation efficiecy was affected by using different types of annotating method (type vs. copy-paste). Typing resulted in shorter annotations while copy-pasting produced better quality of annotation which demonstrated more highly relevant main ideas selected across texts.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectannotation systemen_US
dc.subjectonline readingen_US
dc.subjectreading strategyen_US
dc.subjectscience expositoryen_US
dc.titleSupporting Online Reading of Science Expository with iRuns annotation strategyen_US
dc.typeProceedings Paperen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/U-MEDIA.2014.59en_US
dc.identifier.journal2014 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UBI-MEDIA COMPUTING AND WORKSHOPS (UMEDIA)en_US
dc.citation.spage309en_US
dc.citation.epage312en_US
dc.contributor.department教育研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.department資訊工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Educationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000352622200061en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:會議論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000352622200061.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。