完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.author沙密en_US
dc.contributor.authorR.Saminathanen_US
dc.contributor.author唐麗英en_US
dc.contributor.authorTong, Lee-Ingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-26T01:02:36Z-
dc.date.available2015-11-26T01:02:36Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://140.113.39.130/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT079726802en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/127519-
dc.description.abstractMitigating global warming problems initially involves reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, in which the uncertainty of GHG emission estimates is assessed concisely. Although the uncertainty of GHG emission estimates is generally evaluated using classical confidence intervals, quantifying the uncertainty based on non-normal GHG emission estimates or small dataset may lead to a significant bias. Using bootstrap confidence intervals is an effective means of reducing such a bias. This study presents a procedure for constructing the four bootstrap confidence intervals to assess the uncertainty of GHG emission estimates for non-normal distributions. These bootstrap confidence intervals are standard bootstrap (SB) confidence interval, percentile bootstrap (PB) confidence interval, Bias-corrected percentiles bootstrap (BCPB) confidence interval and bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) confidence interval. The sensitivity of bootstrap intervals for emission data is examined under various combinations of sample size and parameter values of normal and non-normal distributions by using three indices: coverage performance, interval mean, and interval standard deviation. Additionally, this study finds the minimum sample size when constructing bootstrap confidence intervals for emission estimates without considering the distribution of the emission data. Simulation results indicate that the bootstrap intervals are more applicable than the classical confidence interval for the non-normal dataset and small sample size. Moreover, when sample size n is less than 30, the bootstrap confidence interval has a smaller interval length with a smaller deviation than that of the classical 95% confidence interval regardless of whether the data distribution is normal or non-normal. This study recommends a sample size greater than or equal to 15 for estimating the uncertainty of emission estimates without checking the distribution of the data. When the sample size n exceeds 30, either the normality-based 95% confidence interval or bootstrap confidence intervals may be used regardless of whether the data distribution is normal or non-normal. Two case studies with emission data were utilized to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed procedure.zh_TW
dc.description.abstractMitigating global warming problems initially involves reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, in which the uncertainty of GHG emission estimates is assessed concisely. Although the uncertainty of GHG emission estimates is generally evaluated using classical confidence intervals, quantifying the uncertainty based on non-normal GHG emission estimates or small dataset may lead to a significant bias. Using bootstrap confidence intervals is an effective means of reducing such a bias. This study presents a procedure for constructing the four bootstrap confidence intervals to assess the uncertainty of GHG emission estimates for non-normal distributions. These bootstrap confidence intervals are standard bootstrap (SB) confidence interval, percentile bootstrap (PB) confidence interval, Bias-corrected percentiles bootstrap (BCPB) confidence interval and bias-corrected and accelerated (BCa) confidence interval. The sensitivity of bootstrap intervals for emission data is examined under various combinations of sample size and parameter values of normal and non-normal distributions by using three indices: coverage performance, interval mean, and interval standard deviation. Additionally, this study finds the minimum sample size when constructing bootstrap confidence intervals for emission estimates without considering the distribution of the emission data. Simulation results indicate that the bootstrap intervals are more applicable than the classical confidence interval for the non-normal dataset and small sample size. Moreover, when sample size n is less than 30, the bootstrap confidence interval has a smaller interval length with a smaller deviation than that of the classical 95% confidence interval regardless of whether the data distribution is normal or non-normal. This study recommends a sample size greater than or equal to 15 for estimating the uncertainty of emission estimates without checking the distribution of the data. When the sample size n exceeds 30, either the normality-based 95% confidence interval or bootstrap confidence intervals may be used regardless of whether the data distribution is normal or non-normal. Two case studies with emission data were utilized to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed procedure.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBootstrap methodzh_TW
dc.subjectgreenhouse gaseszh_TW
dc.subjectemissionszh_TW
dc.subjectnormal distributionzh_TW
dc.subjectnon-normal distributionszh_TW
dc.subjectuncertaintieszh_TW
dc.subjectconfidence intervalszh_TW
dc.subjectBootstrap methoden_US
dc.subjectgreenhouse gasesen_US
dc.subjectemissionsen_US
dc.subjectnormal distributionen_US
dc.subjectnon-normal distributionsen_US
dc.subjectuncertaintiesen_US
dc.subjectconfidence intervalsen_US
dc.titleQuantification of Uncertainty for Emission Estimates using Bootstrap Methodszh_TW
dc.titleQuantification of Uncertainty for Emission Estimates using Bootstrap Methodsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department工業工程與管理系所zh_TW
顯示於類別:畢業論文