道德推理能力與衝突處理傾向之關聯性研究－人格特質的調節效果

Abstract

本研究旨在瞭解個體道德誰理能力對其衝突處理傾向的預測效果，並探究五大人格特質之外向性、順從性對其道德推理能力與衝突處理傾向間關係的調節效果。研究採用問卷調查法，共回收366份有效問卷。結果指出，個體的道德推理能力愈高，使用整合、逃避及妥協式衝突處理傾向愈高，而使用支配式衝突處理傾向愈低。其次，在人格特質的調節效果方面，外向性的人格特質會弱化其道德推理能力與整合式衝突處理傾向的正向關係；而且，外向性亦會弱化其道德推理能力與支配式衝突處理傾向的負向關係。其次，順從性的人格特質會弱化其道德推理能力與妥協式衝突處理傾向的正向關係；而且，亦會弱化其道德推理能力與支配式衝突處理傾向的負向關係。最後，討論本研究的研究限制、管理實務的意涵及未來研究方向。

This study examines how moral reasoning predicts conflict handling intentions. It also examines the moderating effects of the five major personality factors, which include extraversion and agreeableness, on the relationship between moral reasoning and conflict-handling intentions. The study used the questionnaire survey method and received 366 responses. First, the results demonstrated that higher moral reasoning is associated with higher conflict handling intentions when integrating, avoiding, and compromising, but with lower conflict handling intentions when dominating. Second, the extraversion weakens the positive relationship between moral reasoning and integrating, and also weakens the negative relationship between moral reasoning and dominating. Third, the agreeableness trait weakens the positive relationship between moral reasoning and compromising, and the negative relationship between moral reasoning and dominating. Finally, the research limitations, implications of this study, and suggestions for future research are discussed.