Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author林國雄en_US
dc.contributor.authorKuo-Hsiung Linen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-29T02:47:30Z-
dc.date.available2016-01-29T02:47:30Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/129048-
dc.description.abstract本文提出並回答下列兩個問題:1.為何新儒學經營因果循環分析的每一行為方程式,不用聯立方程法的設定及迴歸來求算其迴歸係數及迴歸常數?2.為何此經營因果循環的分析不存在聯立方程法的結構式及縮減式?本文己完成了單向因果循環順序性主因的深入而充分的論述。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe author tries to reflect and react to the following two issues: 1. Why the specification and regression of simultaneous equation approach were not used to calculate the regression coefficient and regression constant of each behavioral equation in Neo-Confucian causal cycle analyses of business operations? 2. Why the structural form and reduced form in simultaneous equation approach do not exist in these causal cycle analyses in business operations? In this paper, he has done deep and sufficient argumentation on the ordinal major causes of these one-way causal cycles.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWzh_TW
dc.subject新儒學因果循環分析zh_TW
dc.subject聯立方程法zh_TW
dc.subject順序性主因zh_TW
dc.subjectNeo-Confucian causal cycle analyseszh_TW
dc.subjectsimultaneous equation approachzh_TW
dc.subjectordinal major causeszh_TW
dc.title新儒學經營因果循環分析未採用聯立方程法的論述zh_TW
dc.titleArgumentation on Why Simultaneous Equation Approach is Not Used in Neo-Confucian Causal Cycle Analyses of Business Operationsen_US
dc.identifier.journal交大管理學報zh_TW
dc.identifier.journalChiao Da Mangement Reviewen_US
dc.citation.volume1en_US
dc.citation.spage247en_US
dc.citation.epage287en_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.department管理科學學系zh_TW
Appears in Collections:Chiao Da Mangement Review


Files in This Item:

  1. 200706247287.pdf

If it is a zip file, please download the file and unzip it, then open index.html in a browser to view the full text content.