完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 林國雄 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Hsiung Lin | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-29T02:47:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-29T02:47:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11536/129048 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文提出並回答下列兩個問題:1.為何新儒學經營因果循環分析的每一行為方程式,不用聯立方程法的設定及迴歸來求算其迴歸係數及迴歸常數?2.為何此經營因果循環的分析不存在聯立方程法的結構式及縮減式?本文己完成了單向因果循環順序性主因的深入而充分的論述。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The author tries to reflect and react to the following two issues: 1. Why the specification and regression of simultaneous equation approach were not used to calculate the regression coefficient and regression constant of each behavioral equation in Neo-Confucian causal cycle analyses of business operations? 2. Why the structural form and reduced form in simultaneous equation approach do not exist in these causal cycle analyses in business operations? In this paper, he has done deep and sufficient argumentation on the ordinal major causes of these one-way causal cycles. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 新儒學因果循環分析 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 聯立方程法 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | 順序性主因 | zh_TW |
dc.subject | Neo-Confucian causal cycle analyses | zh_TW |
dc.subject | simultaneous equation approach | zh_TW |
dc.subject | ordinal major causes | zh_TW |
dc.title | 新儒學經營因果循環分析未採用聯立方程法的論述 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Argumentation on Why Simultaneous Equation Approach is Not Used in Neo-Confucian Causal Cycle Analyses of Business Operations | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | 交大管理學報 | zh_TW |
dc.identifier.journal | Chiao Da Mangement Review | en_US |
dc.citation.volume | 1 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 247 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 287 | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Management Science | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | 管理科學學系 | zh_TW |
顯示於類別: | 交大管理學報 |