完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hsiuyingen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-28T00:04:26Z-
dc.date.available2016-03-28T00:04:26Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1093-9946en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2741/4412en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/129689-
dc.description.abstractTreatments for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis include immunotherapy with steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, or plasmapheresis as first-line treatments, immunotherapy with rituximab or cyclophosphamide as second-line treatments, and tumor removal. In this systematic review, we evaluated previous studies and examined the association between certain microRNAs and anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis to investigate the performance of different treatment combinations. The efficacies of different combinations of treatments classified into the following four categories were compared: (I) intravenous immunoglobulin administration, (II) plasmapheresis or plasma exchange, (III) treatment with rituximab or cyclophosphamide and (IV) tumor removal. Statistical analyses showed that treatment combinations including at least two of these categories resulted in higher efficacy rates than treatment with a single form of therapy. These findings suggest that if a patient is not recovering, converting to other therapies is more likely to result in early recovery than continuing on the original therapy.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAnti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitisen_US
dc.subjectTreatmenten_US
dc.subjectEfficacy Rateen_US
dc.titleEfficacies of treatments for anti-NMDA receptor encephalitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2741/4412en_US
dc.identifier.journalFRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARKen_US
dc.citation.volume21en_US
dc.citation.spage651en_US
dc.citation.epage663en_US
dc.contributor.department統計學研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Statisticsen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000369079900012en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文