完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorLu, Mingyingen_US
dc.contributor.authorJen, Williamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:56:50Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:56:50Z-
dc.date.issued2016-10en_US
dc.identifier.issn0742-6046en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.20921en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/132587-
dc.description.abstractThis research demonstrates that the type of product option framing (additive vs. subtractive) and the temporal distance between an option choice and later buying behavior can influence decision difficulty. In two studies, the authors show that consumers who engage in additive option framing experience greater difficulty in making decisions for the near future than for the distant future, whereas consumers who engage in subtractive option framing experience greater difficulty in making decisions for the distant future than for the near future. In addition, by using theories of mental simulation, the authors show that communication strategies that promote process simulations for distant-future choices in the subtractive option framing condition and those that promote outcome simulations for near-future choices in the additive option framing condition are most effective in reducing decision difficulty. These effects hold across varying product categories and varying option prices.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleEffects of Product Option Framing and Temporal Distance on Consumer Choice: The Moderating Role of Process versus Outcome Mental Simulationsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/mar.20921en_US
dc.identifier.journalPSYCHOLOGY & MARKETINGen_US
dc.citation.volume33en_US
dc.citation.issue10en_US
dc.citation.spage856en_US
dc.citation.epage863en_US
dc.contributor.department交大名義發表zh_TW
dc.contributor.department運輸與物流管理系 註:原交通所+運管所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentNational Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Transportation and Logistics Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000384298500006en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文