完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorShieh, Gwowenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:56:39Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:56:39Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09-06en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162093en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/132673-
dc.description.abstractEquivalent testing has been strongly recommended for demonstrating the comparability of treatment effects in a wide variety of research fields including medical studies. Although the essential properties of the favorable two one-sided tests of equivalence have been addressed in the literature, the associated power and sample size calculations were illustrated mainly for selecting the most appropriate approximate method. Moreover, conventional power analysis does not consider the allocation restrictions and cost issues of different sample size choices. To extend the practical usefulness of the two one-sided tests procedure, this article describes exact approaches to sample size determinations under various allocation and cost considerations. Because the presented features are not generally available in common software packages, both R and SAS computer codes are presented to implement the suggested power and sample size computations for planning equivalence studies. The exact power function of the TOST procedure is employed to compute optimal sample sizes under four design schemes allowing for different allocation and cost concerns. The proposed power and sample size methodology should be useful for medical sciences to plan equivalence studies.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleExact Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Two One-Sided Tests of Equivalenceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0162093en_US
dc.identifier.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.citation.volume11en_US
dc.citation.issue9en_US
dc.contributor.department管理科學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000383254800040en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文