Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCao, Zehongen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chin-Tengen_US
dc.contributor.authorChuang, Chun-Hsiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorLai, Kuan-Linen_US
dc.contributor.authorYang, Albert C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFuh, Jong-Lingen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shuu-Jiunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:55:58Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:55:58Z-
dc.date.issued2016-11-02en_US
dc.identifier.issn1129-2369en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0697-7en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/132822-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Migraine is characterized by a series of phases (inter-ictal, pre-ictal, ictal, and post-ictal). It is of great interest whether resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) is differentiable between these phases. Methods: We compared resting-state EEG energy intensity and effective connectivity in different migraine phases using EEG power and coherence analyses in patients with migraine without aura as compared with healthy controls (HCs). EEG power and isolated effective coherence of delta (1-3.5 Hz), theta (4-7.5 Hz), alpha (8-12.5 Hz), and beta (13-30 Hz) bands were calculated in the frontal, central, temporal, parietal, and occipital regions. Results: Fifty patients with episodic migraine (1-5 headache days/month) and 20 HCs completed the study. Patients were classified into inter-ictal, pre-ictal, ictal, and post-ictal phases (n = 22, 12, 8, 8, respectively), using 36-h criteria. Compared to HCs, inter-ictal and ictal patients, but not pre- or post-ictal patients, had lower EEG power and coherence, except for a higher effective connectivity in fronto-occipital network in inter-ictal patients (p<.05). Compared to data obtained from the inter-ictal group, EEG power and coherence were increased in the pre-ictal group, with the exception of a lower effective connectivity in fronto-occipital network (p<.05). Inter-ictal and ictal patients had decreased EEG power and coherence relative to HCs, which were "normalized" in the pre-ictal or post-ictal groups. Conclusion: Resting-state EEG power density and effective connectivity differ between migraine phases and provide an insight into the complex neurophysiology of migraine.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMigraine without auraen_US
dc.subjectResting-stateen_US
dc.subjectEEGen_US
dc.subjectPoweren_US
dc.subjectIsolated effective coherenceen_US
dc.titleResting-state EEG power and coherence vary between migraine phasesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s10194-016-0697-7en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAINen_US
dc.citation.volume17en_US
dc.contributor.department資訊工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.department腦科學研究中心zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBrain Research Centeren_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000388713800001en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles