完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChen, Kuo-Huen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeow, Kok-Minen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Li-Ruen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:56:35Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:56:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-4650en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/133190-
dc.description.abstractStudy Objective: To assess whether transabdominal uterine suspension with adjustable sutures (USAS) is beneficial when performed concomitantly with laparoscopic myomectomy in patients with unfavorably localized leiomyomas in whom uterine manipulators are not an option. Design: A retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: A university teaching hospital. Patients: Patients (N = 158) with posterior deep intramural, intraligamental, or cervical leiomyomas; 81 patients underwent USAS (suspension group), and 77 patients did not (control group) concomitantly with laparoscopic myomectomy. Interventions: Transabdominal USAS was performed for all eligible patients undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy using a 2-0 synthetic, monofilament, nonabsorbable polypropylene suture. One end of the double-headed straight needles of the polypropylene suture was inserted into the pelvic cavity through the abdomen to "lift" or "retract" the uterus to allow for the main tumor to be completely exposed and excised. Measurements and Main Results: The average time to create USAS was 2.5 minutes. For the suspension and control groups, the average number of abdominal ports was 3 and 4.4 (p < .001), the average blood loss was 96.3 and 201.5 mL (p < .001), and the average operative time was 50.8 and 91.2 minutes (p < .001), respectively. There was no significant difference in complications (4.9% vs 9.1%, p = .303), but there was a significant difference in conversion to laparotomy (1.2% vs 10.4%, p = .009). At the 3-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in gynecologic and reproductive outcomes, including leiomyoma recurrence, uterine rupture, and pregnancy and live birth rates. The ratio of conversion to laparotomy (odds ratio = 0.108; 95% confidence interval, 0.013-0.884) was much lower in the suspension group. Conclusion: USAS is an easy, safe, and feasible alternative to uterine manipulation when performed concomitantly with laparoscopic myomectomy for unfavorably localized uterine leiomyomas. (C) 2016 AAGL. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic myomectomyen_US
dc.subjectFibroiden_US
dc.subjectUterine leiomyomaen_US
dc.subjectUterine suspension with adjustable suturesen_US
dc.titleUterine Suspension With Adjustable Sutures for Difficult Laparoscopic Myomectomyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.015en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGYen_US
dc.citation.volume24en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage264en_US
dc.citation.epage271en_US
dc.contributor.department機械工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000393729200020en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文