完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChen, Pei-Huaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:55:36Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:55:36Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03en_US
dc.identifier.issn0146-6216en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146621615605307en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/133389-
dc.description.abstractIn educational measurement, building multiple alternate test forms is usually highly desirable in practice. Test assembly problems are classified as NP-hard (Non-deterministic Polynomial-time hard) problems, and their computation time increases exponentially as the problem size grows. The purpose of this study was to construct parallel forms item-by-item based on a seed test, using two proposed item selection heuristic methods (random item sequence assigned to maximum distance form with content balance [R-MD-B] and random item sequence assigned to random form with content balancing [R-R-B]) incorporating a flexible content balancing method. The results were compared with two modified versions of the Armstrong, Jones, and Wu heuristics (random item sequence assigned to maximum distance form with Armstrong\'s replacement [R-MD-R] and random item sequence assigned to random form with Armstrong\'s replacement [R-R-R]) and two models incorporating mixed integer programming (MIP) methods. The results showed that the R-MD-B and R-R-B methods yielded results comparable with the two MIP methods with less computation time in terms of the item information functions, test characteristic curves, and content coverage. The results also showed that R-MD-B and R-R-B can be extended to handle test assembly constraints in practical settings.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjecttest assemblyen_US
dc.subjectitem response theoryen_US
dc.subjectparallel formsen_US
dc.subjectheuristic algorithmen_US
dc.subjectseed testen_US
dc.titleThree-Element Item Selection Procedures for Multiple Forms Assembly: An Item Matching Approachen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0146621615605307en_US
dc.identifier.journalAPPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENTen_US
dc.citation.volume40en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage114en_US
dc.citation.epage127en_US
dc.contributor.department交大名義發表zh_TW
dc.contributor.department管理科學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentNational Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000370360300003en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文