Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTzang, Shyh-Weiren_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chou-Wenen_US
dc.contributor.authorYu, Min-Tehen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:56:29Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:56:29Z-
dc.date.issued2016-05en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-0560en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.10.032en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/133855-
dc.description.abstractThe impact of systematic risk on volatility skew is assessed in a CAPM-GARCH framework under which the relationship between asset price and market index adheres to the CAPM with each residual following an asymmetric GARCH process. From numerical analysis, we demonstrate that (1) the relation between beta and implied volatilities presents a beta smile; (2) beta can determine the shape of implied volatility curve, but systematic risk proportion (SRP) cannot; and (3) the degree of negative skewness and positive kurtosis is proportional to the SRP; however, a higher SRP does not always lead to a higher level of implied volatility. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBeta smileen_US
dc.subjectCAPMen_US
dc.subjectGARCHen_US
dc.subjectSystematic risk proportionen_US
dc.subjectVolatility skewen_US
dc.titleSystematic risk and volatility skewen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.iref.2015.10.032en_US
dc.identifier.journalINTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCEen_US
dc.citation.volume43en_US
dc.citation.spage72en_US
dc.citation.epage87en_US
dc.contributor.department交大名義發表zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentNational Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000375632300006en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles