Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShieh, Gwowenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-21T06:55:46Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-21T06:55:46Z-
dc.date.issued2016-09en_US
dc.identifier.issn1554-351Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0623-yen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/134178-
dc.description.abstractThe intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)(2) index from a one-way random effects model is widely used to describe the reliability of mean ratings in behavioral, educational, and psychological research. Despite its apparent utility, the essential property of ICC(2) as a point estimator of the average score intraclass correlation coefficient is seldom mentioned. This article considers several potential measures and compares their performance with ICC(2). Analytical derivations and numerical examinations are presented to assess the bias and mean square error of the alternative estimators. The results suggest that more advantageous indices can be recommended over ICC(2) for their theoretical implication and computational ease.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMultilevel modelingen_US
dc.subjectRandom effecten_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.titleChoosing the best index for the average score intraclass correlation coefficienten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13428-015-0623-yen_US
dc.identifier.journalBEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODSen_US
dc.citation.volume48en_US
dc.citation.issue3en_US
dc.citation.spage994en_US
dc.citation.epage1003en_US
dc.contributor.department管理科學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000382653900013en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles