Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.author邱育智zh_TW
dc.contributor.author巫木誠zh_TW
dc.contributor.author洪暉智zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Yu-Chihen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Muh-Cherngen_US
dc.contributor.authorHung, Hui-Chihen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-24T07:41:08Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-24T07:41:08Z-
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://etd.lib.nctu.edu.tw/cdrfb3/record/nctu/#GT079633801en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/141559-
dc.description.abstract半導體產業包含三種主要的營運模式,整合元件製造(Integrated Device Manufacturer, IDM)、無晶圓廠(fabless)及晶圓代工(foundry)。整合元件製造公司提供設計與製造服務,無晶圓廠公司的服務聚焦於IC設計服務,晶圓代工公司則提供專業製造代工服務。在產業的競合發展下,無晶圓廠公司與晶圓代工公司形成fabless-foundry策略聯盟的產業鏈垂直分工(Vertically-Separated)合作模式,並與屬於垂直整合(Vertically-Integrated)模式的IDM而形成競爭狀態。由2000-2014市場營收,fabless與foundry成長率大於IDM,且市場生態也產生大的改變。本研究針對半導體產業競合關係進行分析,包含不同營運模式之間的競合關係、成長能量、受市場變動影響以及長期衡點點分析。分析方法採用了Hodrick-Prescott filter,濾除原始營收數據中的循環波動訊號,取得成長趨勢訊號,然後應用Lotka-Volterra模型來分析這些產業營運模式之間的競合關係。結果顯示,無晶圓廠模式和晶圓代工模式彼此間具有共生關係,而IDM模式與fabless-foundry模式彼此之間則存在完全競爭關係。產業鏈垂直整合與垂直分工模式雖然處於競爭狀態,但從長期來看二種模式將會共存於市場,並具備(54.6%, 45.4%)的市場占有率的均衡點。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThree major business models are found in the semiconductor industry, namely Integrated Device Manufacturer (IDMs), fabless, and foundry models. By semiconductor supply chain, IDM is the vertically-integrated model which designs and manufactures IC products. The strategic alliance of fabless and foundry companies is the vertically-separated or fabless–foundry model. Recently, the revenue growth rate of the vertically-separated model has been considerably higher than that of vertically-integrated model. One interesting question raises is whether the vertically-separated model will ultimately dominate the semiconductor industry or grow only to a certain extent. To investigate this, we adopted the Hodrick–Prescott filter to remove the cyclic signal from original revenue data and then applied the Lotka–Volterra model to analyze the competition and cooperation relationships between pairs of these business models. The results reveal that the fabless and foundry models have a mutualistic relationship, whereas IDM competes with both the fabless and foundry models. The vertically-integrated and vertically-separated model compete, but their revenues should ultimately arrive at an equilibrium point. In the long term, the vertically-integrated and vertically-separated models should coexist; the ultimate market share of the vertically-integrated model is predicted to be approximately 54.6% and that of the vertically-separated model approximately 45.4%.en_US
dc.language.isozh_TWen_US
dc.subject整合元件製造zh_TW
dc.subject無晶圓廠zh_TW
dc.subject晶圓代工zh_TW
dc.subjectHodrick–Prescott濾波器zh_TW
dc.subjectLotka–Volterra 模型zh_TW
dc.subject半導體供應鏈zh_TW
dc.subject垂直整合zh_TW
dc.subject垂直分工zh_TW
dc.subjectIDMen_US
dc.subjectfablessen_US
dc.subjectfoundryen_US
dc.subjectHodrick–Prescott filteren_US
dc.subjectLotka–Volterra modelen_US
dc.subjectsemiconductor supply chainen_US
dc.subjectvertically-integrateden_US
dc.subjectvertically-separateden_US
dc.title半導體產業垂直整合與垂直分工營運模式競爭分析zh_TW
dc.titleAnalysis of Competition between Vertically-Integrated and Vertically-Separated Business Models in the Semiconductor Industryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.department工業工程與管理系所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:Thesis