完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chun-Yuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Chung-Haoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLu, Po-Liangen_US
dc.contributor.authorKo, Wen-Chienen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yen-Hsuen_US
dc.contributor.authorHsueh, Po-Renen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T05:52:54Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-21T05:52:54Z-
dc.date.issued2017-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0163-4453en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2017.08.013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/144081-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Rifampin was initially approved for the treatment of tuberculosis. Because of its low toxicity, broad-spectrum activity, and good bioavailability, rifampin is now commonly administered as combination antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of various infections caused by organisms other than mycobacteria. This review summarizes the most recent clinical studies on the use of rifampin combinations for treating four common non-mycobacterial infections: acute bacterial meningitis, infective endocarditis and bacteraemia, pneumonia, and biofilm-related infections. Methods: We performed a literature search of clinical studies published in English from January 2005 to June 2016 using the PubMed database with the search terms "rifampin" with "meningitis" or "infective endocarditis and bacteraemia" or "pneumonia" or "prosthetic joint infections. Results: Current evidence to support a rifampin combination therapy as a treatment for non-mycobacterial infections was largely based on in vitro/in vivo studies and non-comparable retrospective case series. Additionally, controlled clinical trials that directly compared outcomes resulting from rifampin treatment versus treatment without rifampin were limited. Conclusions: Rifampin combination therapy appears promising for the treatment of non-mycobacterial infections. However, further definitive clinical trials are necessary to validate its use because the risk of adverse drug-drug interactions and of the emergence of rifampin resistance during treatment may outweigh the potential benefits. (C) 2017 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectRifampinen_US
dc.subjectMultidrug-resistanten_US
dc.subjectorganismsen_US
dc.subjectBacterial meningitisen_US
dc.titleRole of rifampin for the treatment of bacterial infections other than mycobacteriosisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jinf.2017.08.013en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF INFECTIONen_US
dc.citation.volume75en_US
dc.citation.spage395en_US
dc.citation.epage408en_US
dc.contributor.department生醫工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Biomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000415132000002en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文