完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorWu, Kun-Fengen_US
dc.contributor.authorArdiansyah, Muhammad Nashiren_US
dc.contributor.authorYe, Wei-Jyunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T05:53:15Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-21T05:53:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1538-9588en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1363891en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/144443-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Intersection movement assist (IMA) has been recognized as one of the prominent countermeasures to reduce angle crashes at intersections, which constitute 22% of total crashes in the United States. Utilizing vehicle-based sensors, vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V), and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications, IMA offers extended vision to provide early warning for an imminent crash. However, most of IMA-related research implements their methods and strategies only in simulations, test tracks, or driving simulator studies that have quite a few assumptions and limitations and hence the effectiveness evaluations reported may not be transferable or comparable.Methods: This study seeks to develop a generalized evaluation scheme that can be used not only to assess the effectiveness of IMA on improving traffic safety at intersections but to facilitate comparisons across similar studies. The proposed evaluation scheme utilizes the concepts of traffic conflict in terms of time-to-collision (TTC) as a crash surrogate. This approach avoids the issue of having insufficient crash frequency data for system evaluation. To measure the effectiveness of IMA on reducing traffic conflicts, a relative risk is calculated for comparing the risk of with/without using the IMA. As a proof-of-concept study, this study applied the proposed evaluation scheme and reported the effectiveness of IMA on improving traffic safety in a field operation test (FOT). Seven test scenarios were conducted at 4 intersections, and a total of 40 participants were recruited to use the IMA for 6months.Results: It was estimated that IMA users have 26% fewer conflicts with TTC less than 5s and have 15% fewer conflicts with TTC less than 4s. However, the results vary across different sites and different definitions of conflicts in terms of TTC.Conclusions: Overall, IMA is promising to effectively reduce angle crashes related to sight obstruction and has potential to reduce not only crash frequency but crash severity.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectIntersection movement assisten_US
dc.subjecttraffic conflicten_US
dc.subjecttime-to-collisionen_US
dc.subjectrelative risken_US
dc.subjecttraffic safetyen_US
dc.titleAn evaluation scheme for assessing the effectiveness of intersection movement assist (IMA) on improving traffic safetyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15389588.2017.1363891en_US
dc.identifier.journalTRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTIONen_US
dc.citation.volume19en_US
dc.citation.spage179en_US
dc.citation.epage183en_US
dc.contributor.department運輸與物流管理系 註:原交通所+運管所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Transportation and Logistics Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000423632800011en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文