Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wu, Jiun-Yu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Yuan-Hsuan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, John J. H. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-21T05:53:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-21T05:53:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-03-13 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-1078 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00251 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11536/144670 | - |
dc.description.abstract | To construct CFA, MCFA, and maximum MCFA with LISREL v.8 and below, we provide iMCFA (integrated Multilevel Confirmatory Analysis) to examine the potential multilevel factorial structure in the complex survey data. Modeling multilevel structure for complex survey data is complicated because building a multilevel model is not an infallible statistical strategy unless the hypothesized model is close to the real data structure. Methodologists have suggested using different modeling techniques to investigate potential multilevel structure of survey data. Using iMCFA, researchers can visually set the between-and within-level factorial structure to fit MCFA, CFA and/or MAX MCFA models for complex survey data. iMCFA can then yield between- and within-level variance-covariance matrices, calculate intraclass correlations, perform the analyses and generate the outputs for respective models. The summary of the analytical outputs from LISREL is gathered and tabulated for further model comparison and interpretation. iMCFA also provides LISREL syntax of different models for researchers' future use. An empirical and a simulated multilevel dataset with complex and simple structures in the within or between level was used to illustrate the usability and the effectiveness of the iMCFA procedure on analyzing complex survey data. The analytic results of iMCFA using Muthen's limited information estimator were compared with those of Mplus using Full Information Maximum Likelihood regarding the effectiveness of different estimation methods. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | multilevel structural equation modeling | en_US |
dc.subject | confirmatory factor analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | complex survey data | en_US |
dc.subject | Lisrel | en_US |
dc.subject | Mplus | en_US |
dc.subject | maximum model | en_US |
dc.title | Usingi MCFA to Perform the CFA, Multi level CFA, and Maximum Model for Analyzing Complex Survey Data | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00251 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | en_US |
dc.citation.volume | 9 | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | 教育研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.department | 師資培育中心 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.department | Institute of Education | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Center of Teacher Education | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosnumber | WOS:000427298400001 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |