完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorCao, Zehongen_US
dc.contributor.authorLai, Kuan-Linen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chin-Tengen_US
dc.contributor.authorChuang, Chun-Hsiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorChou, Chien-Chenen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Shuu-Jiunen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T05:53:48Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-21T05:53:48Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0333-1024en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102417733953en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/145172-
dc.description.abstractObjective Entropy-based approaches to understanding the temporal dynamics of complexity have revealed novel insights into various brain activities. Herein, electroencephalogram complexity before migraine attacks was examined using an inherent fuzzy entropy approach, allowing the development of an electroencephalogram-based classification model to recognize the difference between interictal and preictal phases. Methods Forty patients with migraine without aura and 40 age-matched normal control subjects were recruited, and the resting-state electroencephalogram signals of their prefrontal and occipital areas were prospectively collected. The migraine phases were defined based on the headache diary, and the preictal phase was defined as within 72 hours before a migraine attack. Results The electroencephalogram complexity of patients in the preictal phase, which resembled that of normal control subjects, was significantly higher than that of patients in the interictal phase in the prefrontal area (FDR-adjusted p<0.05) but not in the occipital area. The measurement of test-retest reliability (n=8) using the intra-class correlation coefficient was good with r1=0.73 (p=0.01). Furthermore, the classification model, support vector machine, showed the highest accuracy (764%) for classifying interictal and preictal phases using the prefrontal electroencephalogram complexity. Conclusion Entropy-based analytical methods identified enhancement or normalization of frontal electroencephalogram complexity during the preictal phase compared with the interictal phase. This classification model, using this complexity feature, may have the potential to provide a preictal alert to migraine without aura patients.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMigraineen_US
dc.subjectEEGen_US
dc.subjectresting-stateen_US
dc.subjectcomplexityen_US
dc.subjectclassificationen_US
dc.titleExploring resting-state EEG complexity before migraine attacksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0333102417733953en_US
dc.identifier.journalCEPHALALGIAen_US
dc.citation.volume38en_US
dc.citation.spage1296en_US
dc.citation.epage1306en_US
dc.contributor.department腦科學研究中心zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentBrain Research Centeren_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000436023100010en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文