完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChuang, Chia-Chunen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chien-Chingen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Li-Kaien_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Bor-Shyhen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Wen-Juen_US
dc.contributor.authorHo, Chung-Hanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jen-Yinen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-03T06:36:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-03T06:36:00Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1178-2021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S131517en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/145315-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether a nonpharmacological approach through implementation of a communication improvement program (named CICARE for Connect, Introduce, Communicate, Ask, Respond and Exit) into standard operating procedure (SOP) in acute pain service (APS) improved satisfaction in patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). Patients and methods: This was a nonrandomized before-after study. Adult patients (aged between 20 and 80 years) who received IV-PCA after major surgery were included. Implementing CICARE into SOP was conducted in APS. Anonymous questionnaires were used to measure outcomes in this prospective two-part survey. The first part completed by APS nurses contained patients' characteristics, morphine dosage, delivery/demand ratios, IV-PCA side effects and pain at rest measured with an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10). A score of NRS. 4 was defined as inadequately treated pain. The ten-question second part was completed by patients voluntarily after IV-PCA was discontinued. Each question was assessed with a 5-point Likert scale (1: extremely poor; 5: excellent). Patients were separated into "before" and "after" CICARE groups. Primary outcomes were patient global impression of improvement in pain (PGI-Improvement) and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included quality of communication skills, instrument proficiency and accessibility/availability of IV-PCA. Results: The response rate was 55.3%, with 187 usable questionnaires. CICARE effectively improved patient global impression of improvement in pain, patient satisfaction, communication skills and accessibility/availability of IV-PCA. No significant differences were noted in instrument proficiency, morphine dosage, delivery/demand ratios, rates of inadequately treated pain at rest and side effects of IV-PCA between groups. Paradoxical findings were noted between the rates of inadequately treated pain/side effects and PGI-Improvement in pain/patient satisfaction, which were affected by psychological factors. Conclusion: Nonpharmacological interventions carried out by implementing CICARE into SOP for APS effectively improved patient satisfaction and postoperative pain management quality, but this did not affect actual pain.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectacute pain serviceen_US
dc.subjectpatient-physician communicationen_US
dc.subjectnonpharmacological approachen_US
dc.subjectpatient-controlled analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectpatient satisfactionen_US
dc.titleAn innovative nonpharmacological intervention combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia increased patient global improvement in pain and satisfaction after major surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/NDT.S131517en_US
dc.identifier.journalNEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENTen_US
dc.citation.volume13en_US
dc.citation.spage1033en_US
dc.citation.epage1042en_US
dc.contributor.department交大名義發表zh_TW
dc.contributor.department影像與生醫光電研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentNational Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Imaging and Biomedical Photonicsen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000398559000002en_US
dc.citation.woscount1en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. b6f1e3ce73c7d67a3041755280c44736.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。