完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChang, WCWen_US
dc.contributor.authorChu, PYen_US
dc.contributor.authorDing, CGen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, SSen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-08T15:20:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-08T15:20:26Z-
dc.date.issued2000-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0926-2644en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/14533-
dc.description.abstractWith n individuals ranking m objects, the exhaustive comparison approach, proposed in this paper, produces a list of order vectors sorted by the relative number of concordant pairs. The exhaustive comparison approach compares all possible order vectors instead of "an" optimal order vector to help the data analyst to consider "practical" solutions rather than a "desired" solution. An overall concordant order ratio is proposed to measure "how well" each order vector may represent the ranking structure of an ordinal data set. And the marginal concordant ratio evaluating the goodness of fit of each object in each order vector is also proposed in this paper. Comparisons among some popular ranking methods are discussed in this article. An empirical survey data regarding how travelers considered various factors for choosing travelling locations are used to illustrate the proposed method and calculations.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectdistance-based ranking methodsen_US
dc.subjectexhaustive comparison approachen_US
dc.subjectmarginal order ratioen_US
dc.subjectoverall concordant order ratioen_US
dc.subjectoverall rankingen_US
dc.titleAnalyzing ordinal data for group representationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.journalGROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATIONen_US
dc.citation.volume9en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.citation.spage47en_US
dc.citation.epage61en_US
dc.contributor.department經營管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Business and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000085004200003-
dc.citation.woscount1-
顯示於類別:期刊論文


文件中的檔案:

  1. 000085004200003.pdf

若為 zip 檔案,請下載檔案解壓縮後,用瀏覽器開啟資料夾中的 index.html 瀏覽全文。