Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Tzu-Pangen_US
dc.contributor.authorHwang, Cheinwayen_US
dc.contributor.authorSosnica, Krzysztofen_US
dc.contributor.authorKuo, Chung-Yenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ya-Chien_US
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Wen-Haoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T05:54:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-21T05:54:02Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0273-1177en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2016.02.003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/145513-
dc.description.abstractWe assess the impact of orbit modeling on the origin offsets between GRACE kinematic and reduced-dynamic orbits. The origin of the kinematic orbit is the center of IGS network (CN), whereas the origin of the reduced-dynamic orbit is assumed to be the center of mass of the Earth (CM). Theoretically, the origin offset between these two orbits is associated with the geocenter motion. However, the dynamic property of the reduced-dynamic orbit is highly related to orbit parameterizations. The assessment of the F10.7 impact on the geocenter motion is implemented by using different orbit parameterization setups in the reduced-dynamic method. We generate two types of reduced-dynamic orbits using 15 and 240 empirical parameters per day from 2005 to 2012. The empirical parameter used in Bernese GNSS Software is called piece-wise constant empirical acceleration (PCA) and is mainly to absorb the non-gravitational forces mostly related to the atmospheric drag and solar radiation pressure. The differences between kinematic and dynamic orbits can serve as a measurement for geocenter. The RMS value of the geocenter measurement in the 15-PCA case is approximately 3.5 cm and approximately 2 cm in the 240-PCA case. The correlation between the orbit difference and F10.7 is about 0.90 in the 15-PCA case and -0.10 to 0 in the 240-PCA case. This implies that the reduced-dynamic orbit modeled with 240 PCAs absorbs the F10.7 variation, which aliases to the 15-PCA orbit solution. The annual amplitudes of the geocenter motion are 3.1, 3.1 and 2.5 mm in the 15-PCA case, compared to 0.9, 2.0 and 1.3 mm in the 240-PCA case in the X, Y and Z components, respectively. The 15-PCA solution is thus closer to the geocenter motions derived from other space-geodetic techniques. The proposed method is limited to the parameterizations in the reduced-dynamic approach. (C) 2016 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectGPSen_US
dc.subjectGRACEen_US
dc.subjectGeocenter motionen_US
dc.subjectSolar activityen_US
dc.subjectF10.7en_US
dc.titleGeocenter motion estimated from GRACE orbits: The impact of F10.7 solar fluxen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asr.2016.02.003en_US
dc.identifier.journalADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCHen_US
dc.citation.volume59en_US
dc.citation.spage2819en_US
dc.citation.epage2830en_US
dc.contributor.department土木工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000401389200011en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles