Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Pei-Yien_US
dc.contributor.authorSean, Wu-Yangen_US
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Ren-Yuen_US
dc.contributor.authorHsieh, Lin-Han Chiangen_US
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Ray-Quanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSato, Toruen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T05:54:22Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-21T05:54:22Z-
dc.date.issued2017-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-9310en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.05.053en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/145865-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this work is to establish a new pore-scale (m-mu m) model for estimating the dissociation rate of methane hydrate (MH) synthesized in laboratory-scale sediment samples. Finite volume method (FVM) with unstructured mesh were constructed in a representative face-centered cubic unit. The surface model of MH reported by Sean et al. (2007) has been employed. In the bulk flow, concentration of methane in water flow was analyzed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. However, only water flow and solid MH are simulated without considering ice or gas phase. In this study, tentative cases with porosity 0.74, 0.66, and 0.49 is individually considered as representative cubic unit of MH array. The initial temperature, 253.15 (K) of MH pellets inside the cubic unit dissociated due to the driving force of fugacity variation, ex. 0.56 and 0.54 (MPa) while warm water of 282.15 and 276.15 (K) flow in. In the calculation, periodic conditions are imposed at surfaces of inlet/right/front sides updated every time step. The flux of methane at the surface are all regarded as being dissolved into the water in this high pressure state, and compared to Kim et al. (1987)'s correlation at Reynolds no. of about 50. Results of dissociation flux in cases 5 and 6 with porosity 0.49 show good agreements with Kim's correlation. However, as the porosity increases, flux increases due to the fast transport in bulk flow such as cases 1-4 in this study. If the transport process in bulk flow is faster than dissociation rate, then the surface flux becomes saturated as Reynolds no. greater than 100 in this work. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMethane hydrateen_US
dc.subjectDissociation modelen_US
dc.subjectCFDen_US
dc.subjectMass and heat transferen_US
dc.subjectPore-scale flowen_US
dc.subjectCubic uniten_US
dc.subjectSediment samplesen_US
dc.titleDirect numerical simulation of methane hydrate dissociation in pore-scale flow by using CFD methoden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.05.053en_US
dc.identifier.journalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFERen_US
dc.citation.volume113en_US
dc.citation.spage176en_US
dc.citation.epage183en_US
dc.contributor.department機械工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000406731300017en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles