標題: Vaginal microbiome variances in sample groups categorized by clinical criteria of bacterial vaginosis
作者: Chen, Hui-Mei
Chang, Tzu-Hao
Lin, Feng-Mao
Liang, Chao
Chiu, Chih-Min
Yang, Tzu-Ling
Yang, Ting
Huang, Chia-Yen
Cheng, Yeong-Nan
Chang, Yi-An
Chang, Po-Ya
Weng, Shun-Long
生物科技學系
生物資訊及系統生物研究所
Department of Biological Science and Technology
Institude of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
公開日期: 31-十二月-2018
摘要: BackgroundOne of the most common and recurrent vaginal infections is bacterial vaginosis (BV). The diagnosis is based on changes to the normal vaginal microbiome; however, the normal microbiome appears to differ according to reproductive status and ethnicity, and even among individuals within these groups. The Amsel criteria and Nugent score test are widely used for diagnosing BV; however, these tests are based on different criteria, and so may indicate distinct changes in the vaginal microbial community. Nevertheless, few studies have compared the results of these test against metagenomics analysis.MethodsVaginal flora samples from 77 participants were classified according to the Amsel criteria and Nugent score test. The microbiota composition was analyzed using 16S ribosome RNA gene amplicon sequencing. Bioinformatics analysis and multivariate statistical analysis were used to evaluate the microbial diversity and function.ResultsOnly 3 % of the participants diagnosed BV negative using the Amsel criteria (A-) were BV-positive according to the Nugent score test (N+), while over half of the BV-positive patients using the Amsel criteria (A+) were BV-negative according to the Nugent score test (N-). Thirteen genera showed significant differences in distribution among BV status defined by BV tests (e.g., A-N-, A+N- and A+N+). Variations in the four most abundant taxa, Lactobacillus, Gardnerella, Prevotella, and Escherichia, were responsible for most of this dissimilarity. Furthermore, vaginal microbial diversity differed significantly among the three groups classified by the Nugent score test (N-, N+, and intermediate flora), but not between the Amsel criteria groups. Numerous predictive microbial functions, such as bacterial chemotaxis and bacterial invasion of epithelial cells, differed significantly among multiple BV test, but not between the A- and A+ groups.ConclusionsMetagenomics analysis can greatly expand our current understanding of vaginal microbial diversity in health and disease. Metagenomics profiling may also provide more reliable diagnostic criteria for BV testing.
URI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-5284-7
http://hdl.handle.net/11536/148654
ISSN: 1471-2164
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-5284-7
期刊: BMC GENOMICS
Volume: 19
Issue: 10
顯示於類別:期刊論文