完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Wo-Janen_US
dc.contributor.authorLansdown, Drew A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrace, Trevoren_US
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Alan L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFeeley, Brian T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHung, Li-Weien_US
dc.contributor.authorMa, C. Benjaminen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T06:01:07Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-02T06:01:07Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1058-2746en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/148715-
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study evaluated outcomes after treatment of shoulder periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with a 3-stage revision protocol consisting of (1) debridement, explantation, and cement spacer placement, followed by parenteral antibiotics; (2) open biopsy and debridement; and (3) reimplantation if cultures were negative. We hypothesized this protocol would eradicate persistent infection while producing excellent functional and subjective outcomes, and there would be no difference in these parameters for patients with shoulder PJI compared with patients with revision for aseptic indications. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively collected revision shoulder arthroplasty cohort to identify shoulder PJI patients treated with a 3-stage protocol. Demographics, culture data, range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Outcomes for patients with shoulder PJI and revision to RTSA were compared with patients revised to RTSA for noninfectious indications. Significance was defined as P < .05. Results: There were 28 cases of shoulder PJI in 27 patients (age, 66.4 +/- 11.2 years,); of these, 21 shoulders were revised to RTSA, and 7 shoulders were revised to hemiarthroplasty. There was no recurrent infection at a mean 32-month follow-up. One year after surgery, mean forward flexion was 110 degrees +/- 41 degrees and abduction was 106 degrees +/- 42 degrees. Mean final American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective score was 66.5 +/- 23.3. The 21 shoulders with PJI revised to RTSA had no differences for functional and subjective outcomes compared with revised patients without shoulder PJI. Conclusions: A 3-stage revision protocol for shoulder PJI reliably eradicated infection. Patients with PJI revised to RTSA can have similar outcomes as patients with noninfectious revision to RTSA. (C) 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectShoulder periprosthetic infectionen_US
dc.subjectthree-stage protocolen_US
dc.subjectreverse total shoulder arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectfunctional outcomeen_US
dc.subjectpatient-reported outcomeen_US
dc.subjectvisual analog scaleen_US
dc.titleOutcomes of revision arthroplasty for shoulder periprosthetic joint infection: a three-stage revision protocolen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.014en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERYen_US
dc.citation.volume28en_US
dc.citation.spage268en_US
dc.citation.epage275en_US
dc.contributor.department生物科技學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biological Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000455671700015en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文