完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorLai, Chih-Huien_US
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Ying-Chiaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T05:58:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-02T05:58:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0966-0879en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12224en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/148898-
dc.description.abstractBuilding on the resilience literature, this study analyzes the response networks that were activated for four disasters during 2015-2016 (Cyclone Pam, the 2015 Nepal earthquake, Cyclone Winston, the 2016 Ecuador earthquake). The analysis shows that different interrelated resilient capacities are manifested in the activation of response networks. In particular, in exhibiting redundancy and robustness, disaster-specific network structures are discerned. In both cyclones, response networks resemble a predefined cluster design, whereas in the earthquake disasters, networks are more fluid. Moreover, organizations' varied levels of prior response experiences help build the network's capacities of redundancy and resourcefulness. Implications are discussed in ways to advance contributions to research on resilience and disaster response networks.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectinternational humanitarian effortsen_US
dc.subjectinterorganizational networksen_US
dc.subjectnatural disastersen_US
dc.subjectresilienceen_US
dc.subjectsocial network analysisen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding activated network resilience: A comparative analysis of co-located and co-cluster disaster response networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-5973.12224en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENTen_US
dc.citation.volume27en_US
dc.citation.spage14en_US
dc.citation.epage27en_US
dc.contributor.department傳播與科技學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Communication and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000459310900002en_US
dc.citation.woscount2en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文