完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorPan, Ho-hsienen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Mao-Hsuen_US
dc.contributor.authorLyu, Shao-Renen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T06:04:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-02T06:04:20Z-
dc.date.issued2011-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/150570-
dc.description.abstractThis study explored the effective articulatory and acoustic parameters for distinguishing Taiwan Min falling unchecked tones 53 and 31 and checked tones 5 and 3. Data were collected from Zhangzhou, Quanzhou, and mixed accents in northern, central, and southern Taiwan. Results showed that EGG parameters, Contact Quotients (CQ) and Peak Increase in Contact (PIC) were not effective in distinguishing checked from unchecked tones across speakers. In contrast, f0 contour and Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) consistently distinguished checked tones from unchecked tones across speakers. The f0 onset was highest for tone 53, followed in order by tone 3, 5 and 31. The f0 contours of tone 5 were the highest in the later half of the vowels. CPP measures of checked tones were higher than those of unchecked tones in the latter portion of vowels.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectElectroglottoraphen_US
dc.subjectglottal wave formen_US
dc.subjectf0en_US
dc.subjectCepstral peak prominenceen_US
dc.subjectTaiwan Minen_US
dc.subjectphonationen_US
dc.titleElectroglottograph and Acoustic Cues for Phonation Contrasts in Taiwan Min Falling Tonesen_US
dc.typeProceedings Paperen_US
dc.identifier.journal12TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SPEECH COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION 2011 (INTERSPEECH 2011), VOLS 1-5en_US
dc.citation.spage656en_US
dc.citation.epage659en_US
dc.contributor.department外國語文學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literaturesen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000316502200166en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:會議論文