完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChang, Hsiu-yunen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Woan-lihen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yanzhien_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-02T00:25:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-02T00:25:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0927-5398en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.02.003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/151632-
dc.description.abstractThis paper reexamines the effect of institutional ownership on corporate patent-based innovation. Using an updated sample, we confirm that higher institutional ownership leads to more innovations, including more citations received by patents of a firm, and higher patent generality and originality. However, we find that the impact of institutional ownership on patent-based innovation greatly decreases after the tech bubble bursts and this lower support is driven by both transient and non-transient institutional investors. We do not find that institutional investors intentionally lower their support of patent-based innovation for improving this less efficient innovation. Our results support the contention that the exorbitant litigation cost of patents lowers the incentives for institutional investors to invest in patent-based innovation after 2000.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional ownershipen_US
dc.subjectInnovationen_US
dc.subjectPatenten_US
dc.subjectPatent costen_US
dc.titleDo institutional investors still encourage patent-based innovation after the tech bubble period?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.02.003en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCEen_US
dc.citation.volume51en_US
dc.citation.spage149en_US
dc.citation.epage164en_US
dc.contributor.department資訊管理與財務金融系 註:原資管所+財金所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Information Management and Financeen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000462421800009en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文