Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Sharath B. R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Kuochenen_US
dc.contributor.authorShen, Shi-Minen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-03T01:08:38Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-03T01:08:38Z-
dc.date.issued2019-05-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1016-2364en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.6688/JISE.201905_35(3).0011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/151988-
dc.description.abstractWith the use of the Internet, mobile platforms, online commerce, and social media services, the footprints of human behavior can be easily recorded in the digital world, which generates data on an extremely large scale. Twitter as a big data social network becomes one of the most important sources for capturing up-to-date events happened in the world. Deriving topics from Twitter is important for various applications, such as situation awareness, market analysis, content filtering, and recommendations. However, topic derivation with high purity in Twitter is hard to achieve because tweets are limited to 140 characters. Previous works on topic derivation in Twitter suffer from low purity. In this paper, we propose corpus-based topic derivation (CTD) approach that combines a Twitter corpus and LF-LDA, which is a text processing model to identify topics and clusters of similar hashtags. We use asymmetric topic LF-LDA to obtain better purity of topics. Compared to intJNMF, a representative related work, the purity (F-measure) of our proposed CTD increases from 5.26% (27.81%) to 11.32% (34.28%) for 20 to 100 topics. We also propose a timestamp-based popular hashtags prediction (TPHP) approach by creating trending hashtags lists (THLs), which are lists of hashtags used by many users and make use of timestamps in tweets. We use the edit distance to find the difference between consecutive THLs. Then the difference can be used to calculate volatilety to find how people react to real world events. Compared to Hybrid+, a representative related work, the mean average precision (MAP) of our TPHP increases by 19.45% (week-day), 15.08% (week-week) and 16.95% (month-week).en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectcorpusen_US
dc.subjectpopular hashtag predictionen_US
dc.subjecttimestampen_US
dc.subjecttopic derivationen_US
dc.subjecttwitteren_US
dc.titleCorpus-based Topic Derivation and Timestamp-based Popular Hashtag Prediction in Twitteren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.6688/JISE.201905_35(3).0011en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERINGen_US
dc.citation.volume35en_US
dc.citation.issue3en_US
dc.citation.spage675en_US
dc.citation.epage696en_US
dc.contributor.department資訊工程學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000467782400012en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles