Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFan, Pei-Yien_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, Ming-Jenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Sheng-Hsuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Hsin-Hsuen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Ming-Yangen_US
dc.contributor.authorTian, Ya-Chungen_US
dc.contributor.authorKuo, Georgeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-02T02:15:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-02T02:15:23Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0896-8608en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2018.00218en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/152142-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Peritonitis is a serious complication after invasive procedures in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). Most studies that have investigated peritonitis following invasive gynecologic procedures enrolled small patient populations. This study focuses on the clinical presentation, outcomes, and effects of prophylactic antibiotic use before invasive techniques. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent invasive gynecologic procedures between 2005 and 2015 in a tertiary medical center. Eligible patients were identified and enrolled and their demographic data were collected. The use of prophylactic antibiotics and the outcomes of peritonitis were recorded. Results: Twenty-six gynecologic procedures were performed on 18 PD patients. Seven episodes of peritonitis occurred in 6 patients after invasive gynecologic procedures. Eleven procedures were preceded by prophylactic antibiotic treatment (6 oral cefadroxil, 1 oral cefuroxime, 1 oral clindamycin, 1 intravenous [IV] ceftriaxone, 1 IV ceftazidime, and 1 IV cefazolin). The pathogens were diverse (group B Streptococcus, group D Streptococcus, E. coli, and Enterococcus). All episodes of peritonitis were successfully treated using intraperitoneal antibiotics without recurrence, technique failure, or mortality. The odds ratio of peritonitis in the non-prophylaxis group was 20.29 (95% confidence interval 1.01 - 406.35, p = 0.0103). Conclusion: The use of prophylactic antibiotic treatment considerably reduced the risk of peritonitis after invasive gynecologic procedures.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectPeritoneal dialysisen_US
dc.subjecthysteroscopyen_US
dc.subjectantibiotic prophylaxisen_US
dc.titlePROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTIC REDUCES THE RISK OF PERITONITIS AFTER INVASIVE GYNECOLOGIC PROCEDURESen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3747/pdi.2018.00218en_US
dc.identifier.journalPERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONALen_US
dc.citation.volume39en_US
dc.citation.issue4en_US
dc.citation.spage356en_US
dc.citation.epage361en_US
dc.contributor.department統計學研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Statisticsen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000474846100011en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles