完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorWang, Ligangen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Mingen_US
dc.contributor.authorKungas, Raineren_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Tzu-Enen_US
dc.contributor.authorDiethelm, Stefanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarechal, Francoisen_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Herle, Janen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-02T02:18:34Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-02T02:18:34Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn1364-0321en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.071en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/152365-
dc.description.abstractPower-to-fuel systems via solid-oxide electrolysis are promising for storing excess renewable electricity by efficient electrolysis of steam (or co-electrolysis of steam and CO2) into hydrogen (or syngas), which can be further converted into synthetic fuels with plant-wise thermal integration. Electrolysis stack performance and durability determine the system design, performance, and long-term operating strategy; thus, solid-oxide electrolyzer based power-to-fuels were investigated from the stack to system levels. At the stack level, the data from a 6000-h stack testing under laboratory isothermal conditions were used to calibrate a quasi-2D model, which enables to predict practical, isothermal stack performance with reasonable accuracy. Feasible stack operating windows meeting various design specifications (e.g., specific syngas composition) were further generated to support the selection of operating points. At the system level, with the chosen similar stack operating points, various power-to-fuel systems, including power-to-hydrogen, power-to-methane, power-to-methanol (dimethyl ether) and power-to-gasoline, were compared techno-economically considering system-level heat integration. Several operating strategies of the stack were compared to address the increase in stack temperature due to degradation. The modeling results show that the system efficiency for producing H-2, methane, methanol/dimethyl ether and gasoline decreases sequentially from 94% (power-to-H-2) to 64% (power-to-gasoline), based on a higher heating value. Co-electrolysis, which allows better heat integration, can improve the efficiency of the systems with less exothermic fuel-synthesis processes (e.g., methanol/dimethyl ether) but offers limited advantages for power-tomethane and power-to-gasoline systems. In a likely future scenario, where the growing amount of electricity from renewable sources results in increasing periods of a negative electricity price, solid oxide electrolyser based power-to-fuel systems are highly suitable for levelling the price fluctuations in an economic way.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectPower-to-fuelen_US
dc.subjectEnergy storageen_US
dc.subjectSolid-oxide electrolysisen_US
dc.subjectCo-electrolysisen_US
dc.subjectOperating windowen_US
dc.subjectDegradationen_US
dc.titlePower-to-fuels via solid-oxide electrolyzer: Operating window and techno-economicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.071en_US
dc.identifier.journalRENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWSen_US
dc.citation.volume110en_US
dc.citation.spage174en_US
dc.citation.epage187en_US
dc.contributor.department分子醫學與生物工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Molecular Medicine and Bioengineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000468746300013en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文