Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, Ting-Tseen_US
dc.contributor.authorJuang, Jimmy Jyh-Mingen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jen-Kuangen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsai, Chia-Tien_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chen-Huanen_US
dc.contributor.authorYu, Wen-Chungen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Hao-minen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Yen-Wenen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Yu-Weien_US
dc.contributor.authorKuo, Chi-Taien_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Jin-Jeren_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Zhih-Cherngen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Wei-Tingen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Ping-Yenen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Po-weien_US
dc.contributor.authorYen, Hsueh-Weien_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Ying-Chihen_US
dc.contributor.authorTseng, Wei-Kungen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiang, Fu-Tienen_US
dc.contributor.authorWu, Cho-Kaien_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-02T07:46:14Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-02T07:46:14Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0889-4655en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000515en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/152630-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate whether home or ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring was associated with preclinical hypertensive cardiovascular target organ damage (TOD). Methods: We enrolled participants with prehypertension and stage 1 hypertension from 11 medical centers within the Taiwan hypertension-associated cardiac disease consortium. Recordings of clinical BP measurement, ambulatory BP monitoring for 24 hours, and home BP monitoring during morning and evening were made. The measured parameters of target organ damage included left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left atrial volume index (LAVI), and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV). Results: Data were collected from 561 study participants (mean age, 65.0 +/- 10.8 years; men, 61.3%). Morning and evening home BP values were slightly higher than the daytime and nighttime ABP values (difference for systolic morning-daytime/evening-nighttime, 7.3 +/- 14.2/11.3 +/- 18.5 mm Hg, P <.001; for diastolic, 5.4 +/- 9.4/ 7.3 +/- 12.1, P <.001). Daytime ambulatory (r = 0.114), nighttime ambulatory (r = 0.130), morning home (r = 0.310), and evening home (r = 0.220) systolic BPs (SBPs) were all associated with LVMI (all P <.05). The correlation coefficient was significantly greater for the relationship between daytime home SBP and LVMI than for the relationship between ambulatory SBP and LVMI (P <.01). The goodness of fit of the association between SBP and LVMI improved by adding home daytime SBP to the other SBPs (P <.001). Similar findings were observed for LAVI, but not for PWV. Conclusion: These findings indicate that morning SBP assessed by home monitoring appears to be a better predictor than other BP measures to determine preclinical hypertensive cardiovascular damage in patients with early-stage hypertension.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjecthome and ambulatory blood pressureen_US
dc.subjecthypertensive cardiovascular damageen_US
dc.titleComparison of Home and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements in Association With Preclinical Hypertensive Cardiovascular Damageen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/JCN.0000000000000515en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSINGen_US
dc.citation.volume34en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage106en_US
dc.citation.epage114en_US
dc.contributor.department分子醫學與生物工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Molecular Medicine and Bioengineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000480798800014en_US
dc.citation.woscount1en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles