完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Yung-Chengen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Kui-Chouen_US
dc.contributor.authorShih, Cheng-Minen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kun-Tsanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Kun-Huien_US
dc.contributor.authorHsu, Cheng-Enen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-02T07:46:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-02T07:46:16Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-16en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-799Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1259-xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/152658-
dc.description.abstractBackgroundsThe aim of our study was to investigate failure rates of reconstruction plate and non-reconstruction plate, and find the best strategy for implant selection for different fracture types for midshaft clavicular fractures.Patients and methodsTwo hundred twenty-six consecutive patients with midshaft clavicular fractures who received open reduction and plate fixation during Jan 2012 to July 2017 were reviewed. The correlations between implant failure rates and risk factors including demographic data, fracture classifications, and implant types were analyzed.ResultsAO/OTA fracture classification and plate types are the most important factors affecting implant failure for midshaft clavicular fractures. Reconstruction plate had a significantly higher failure rate (53%) than that of non-reconstruction plates (3%) in comminuted midshaft clavicular (AO/OTA 15-2C) fractures (P value <0.01). However, the difference was not significant in AO/OTA 15-2A and 2B classifications.ConclusionPatients with comminuted midshaft clavicular (AO/OTA 15-2C) fractures treated with reconstruction plates had very high implant failure rates compared to non-reconstruction plates. We suggested that patients with comminuted midshaft clavicular (AO/OTA 15-2C) fractures treated with reconstruction plates need more protection and more frequent follow-up in the postoperative period.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectDynamic compression plateen_US
dc.subjectLocking plateen_US
dc.subjectMidshaft clavicular fractureen_US
dc.subjectOpen reduction and internal fixationen_US
dc.subjectReconstruction plateen_US
dc.titleComparison of implant failure rates of different plates for midshaft clavicular fractures based on fracture classificationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13018-019-1259-xen_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCHen_US
dc.citation.volume14en_US
dc.citation.spage0en_US
dc.citation.epage0en_US
dc.contributor.department分子醫學與生物工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Molecular Medicine and Bioengineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000475851400006en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文