Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chung-Chengen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Shi-Shuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-05T00:08:37Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-05T00:08:37Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-900Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12151en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/152779-
dc.description.abstractWe illustrate the role of the law of diminishing marginal utility in the two main modern utility theories, the ordinal and cardinal utility theories, using a generalised total utility function. In short, the ordinal utility theory, in which utility is immeasurable, must abandon the law of diminishing marginal utility; the cardinal utility theory, although able to retain this law, suffers from keeping the unrealistic view of utility measurability, which Samuelson criticises as "infinitely improbable." A new utility theory with the advantages of the two mentioned theories (i.e. the notions of both diminishing marginal utility and utility immeasurability) but without the disadvantages (i.e. the law of diminishing marginal utility is excluded and utility is measurable) therefore still seems to be a Holy Grail deserving search and development by economists.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectcardinal utilityen_US
dc.subjectdiminishing marginal utilityen_US
dc.subjectordinal utilityen_US
dc.titleThe role of diminishing marginal utility in the ordinal and cardinal utility theoriesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1467-8454.12151en_US
dc.identifier.journalAUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC PAPERSen_US
dc.citation.volume58en_US
dc.citation.issue3en_US
dc.citation.spage233en_US
dc.citation.epage246en_US
dc.contributor.department經營管理研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Business and Managementen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000485926600001en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles