Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Zhongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChuang, Yi-Hsuehen_US
dc.contributor.authorSzczuka, Aleksandraen_US
dc.contributor.authorIshida, Kenneth P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRoback, Shannonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPlumlee, Megan H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMitch, William A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-05T00:08:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-05T00:08:48Z-
dc.date.issued2019-11-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0043-1354en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.114939en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/152879-
dc.description.abstractAdvanced oxidation using UV/free chlorine and UV/chloramines are being considered as alternatives to UV/H2O2 for treatment of reverse osmosis (RO) permeate in treatment trains for the potable reuse of municipal wastewater. This pilot-scale comparison of the three advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) evaluated three factors important for selecting among these alternatives. First, the study characterized the speciation of oxidants serving as the source of radicals within the AOPs to facilitate process modeling. Kinetic modeling that included consideration of the chloramines occurring in RO permeate accurately predicted oxidant speciation. Modeling of the UV/free chlorine AOP indicated that free chlorine is scavenged by reactions with ammonia and monochloramine in RO permeate, such that oxidant speciation can shift in favor of dichloramine over the short (similar to 30 s) timescale of AOP treatment. Second, the order of efficacy for degrading the target contaminant, 1,4-dioxane, in terms of minimizing UV fluence was UV/free chlorine > UV/H2O2 >> UV/chloramines. However, estimates indicated that the UV/chloramines and UV/H2O2 AOPs could be similar on a cost-effectiveness basis due to savings in reagent costs by the UV/chloramines AOP, provided the RO permeate featured >3 mg/L as Cl-2 chloramines. Third, the study evaluated whether the use of chlorine-based oxidants within the UV/free chlorine and UV/chloramines AOPs enhanced disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation. Even after AOP treatment and chloramination, total halogenated DBP formation remained low at <15 mu g/L for all three AOPs. DBP formation was similar between the AOPs, except that the UV/free chlorine AOP promoted haloacetaldehyde formation, while the UV/H2O2 and UV/chloramines AOPs followed by chloramination increased chloropicrin formation. However, total DBP formation on a toxic potency-weighted basis was similar among the AOPs, since haloacetonitriles and haloacetamides were the dominant contributors and did not differ significantly among the AOPs. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectUV/Free chlorine AOPen_US
dc.subjectUV/Chloramines AOPen_US
dc.subject1,4-Dioxaneen_US
dc.subjectDisinfection byproducten_US
dc.subjectPotable reuseen_US
dc.titlePilot-scale evaluation of oxidant speciation, 1,4-dioxane degradation and disinfection byproduct formation during UV/hydrogen peroxide, UV/free chlorine and UV/chloramines advanced oxidation process treatment for potable reuseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.watres.2019.114939en_US
dc.identifier.journalWATER RESEARCHen_US
dc.citation.volume164en_US
dc.citation.spage0en_US
dc.citation.epage0en_US
dc.contributor.department環境工程研究所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentInstitute of Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000484645800040en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles