完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chin-Hoen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Junmaoen_US
dc.contributor.authorChung, Huiminen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-02T00:04:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-02T00:04:21Z-
dc.date.issued1970-01-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0270-7314en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fut.22077en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/153389-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the impact of arbitrage in put-call futures parity (PCFP) violations on option market liquidity and explores the liquidity provision process by trader type during periods of arbitrage exploitation. Using a unique data set comprising the complete history of transactions, we find that PCFP violations contain toxic arbitrage opportunities. Hence, more frequent toxic arbitrage opportunities can cause liquidity to deteriorate because arbitrageurs create adverse selection costs and order imbalances in the option market. In addition, when the law of one price breaks down, market makers dominate by providing liquidity compared with individual, domestic, and foreign institutional traders.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectarbitrageen_US
dc.subjectliquidity provisionen_US
dc.subjectput-call futures parityen_US
dc.titleArbitrage opportunities, liquidity provision, and trader types in an index option marketen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/fut.22077en_US
dc.identifier.journalJOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETSen_US
dc.citation.spage0en_US
dc.citation.epage0en_US
dc.contributor.department資訊管理與財務金融系 註:原資管所+財金所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Information Management and Financeen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000497825400001en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文