Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Po-Chinen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Shiao-Yenen_US
dc.contributor.authorZhai, Rui-Xiangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-02T23:54:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-02T23:54:23Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0313-5926en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2018.04.002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/153475-
dc.description.abstractThis paper uses the slacks-based super-efficiency DEA model and panel smooth transition regression model to evaluate the nonlinear effects of one-period lagged efficiency score, core capital ratio (the proxy of operating risk), price cost margin (the proxy of market monopoly or competition pressure) and demand management policy (monetary and fiscal policies) on banks' current performance. In empirical, 37 New York commercial banks during 1996: 3Q-2016: 3Q as sample objects (i.e., 2997 observations). The empirical results show that the increases in monopoly power, leverage ratio, and real federal fund rate would reduce the banks' performance as the leading indicator is below its threshold. However, long-run interest rates have a reverse effect. The opposite conclusion holds as the leading indicator is over the threshold. The associated policies to raise the performance are to create competitive environments and construct a dynamic leverage ratio varying with the change of the leading indicator. In addition, resolving the problem of high financing costs, reducing short-run interest rates and increasing long-run interest rates during recessionary periods are also available. (c) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Economic Society of Australia, Queensland.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSlacks-based super-efficiency DEA modelen_US
dc.subjectPanel smooth transition regression (PSTR) modelen_US
dc.subjectLeading indicatoren_US
dc.subjectPerformance persistenceen_US
dc.subjectReal federal fund rateen_US
dc.subjectNational debt ratioen_US
dc.titleNonlinear impacts of operating risk and demand management policy on banks' performance: The role of leading indicatoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eap.2018.04.002en_US
dc.identifier.journalECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICYen_US
dc.citation.volume59en_US
dc.citation.spage40en_US
dc.citation.epage53en_US
dc.contributor.department資訊管理與財務金融系 註:原資管所+財金所zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Information Management and Financeen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000443034200005en_US
dc.citation.woscount2en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles