Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Wen-Kuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChou, Chang-Yien_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Shyi-Genen_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chiehfengen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hsian-Jennen_US
dc.contributor.authorYang, Ten-Fangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T00:01:29Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-05T00:01:29Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0368-2811en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyz142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/153923-
dc.description.abstractBackground Sequential free flap reconstruction in patient with head and neck cancer can provide reliable and effective wound coverage. Only a few studies have reported on the outcome and complications analysis but without consensus on the recipient vessels and flap chosen. Herein, we presented the outcome and analysed the risk factors for complications in sequential free flap reconstruction. Patients and methods Patients who had sequential free tissue transfers due to cancer recurrence, second primary cancer, or secondary correction of the soft tissue contractures and volume deficits were all included. Variables extracted included demographics, comorbidities, free flap characteristics, infection, dehiscence and flap necrosis rates. Results In total, 40 patients with 92 free flaps were analyzed; 42 initial and 50 sequential free flaps. The most common recipient vessels for sequential flap were contralateral superficial thyroid vessels (68%). The most common flap for both initial and sequential free flap was anterolateral thigh flap (64.3 and 62%). The success rate of sequential free flap was 92.0 compared to 92.9% for initial free flap, which showed no significant difference. Female was independently associated with delayed wound healing with an odds ratio of 90.91 (95% confidence interval 0.001-0.17, P = 0.001), as well as diabetes with an odds ratio of 31.14 (95% confidence interval 2.60-373.19, P = 0.007). Sequential free flap was not a risk factor for any complication. Conclusions Sequential free flap is a reliable method for head and neck surgery without more complication rate comparing to initial free flap reconstruction. More attentions should be paid on patients with preferential risk for certain complications.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectsequential free flapen_US
dc.subjectsecondary head and neck cancer reconstructionen_US
dc.titleIs sequential free flap safe in oral cancer reconstruction in the same patient? An outcome and complication analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jjco/hyz142en_US
dc.identifier.journalJAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGYen_US
dc.citation.volume50en_US
dc.citation.issue2en_US
dc.citation.spage152en_US
dc.citation.epage158en_US
dc.contributor.department生物科技學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Biological Science and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000515114500008en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
Appears in Collections:Articles