完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorShieh, Gwowenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T00:02:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-05T00:02:23Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-13en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00933-zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/154192-
dc.description.abstractBackground Percentiles are widely used in scientific research for determining the comparative magnitude and reference limit of quantitative measurements. The investigations for point and interval estimation of normal percentiles are well documented in the literature. However, the corresponding statistical tests of hypothesis have received relatively little attention. Methods To facilitate data analysis and design planning of percentile study, this paper aims to present hypothesis testing procedures and associated power functions for assessing the difference, noninferiority, and equivalence of normal percentiles. Results Numerical illustrations about drug dissolution are provided to demonstrate the usefulness of the suggested exact approaches and the deficiency of approximate methods. Conclusions The exact approaches are superior to the approximate methods on the basis of control of Type I errors. Computer algorithms are constructed to implement the recommended test procedures and sample size calculations for percentile analysis.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectPoweren_US
dc.subjectQuantileen_US
dc.subjectReference limiten_US
dc.subjectSample sizeen_US
dc.titleComparison of alternative approaches for difference, noninferiority, and equivalence testing of normal percentilesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12874-020-00933-zen_US
dc.identifier.journalBMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGYen_US
dc.citation.volume20en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
dc.citation.spage0en_US
dc.citation.epage0en_US
dc.contributor.department管理科學系zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Management Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000519951700002en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文