完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位語言
dc.contributor.authorYouh, Meng-Jeyen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Chun-Shuanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPu, Nen-Wenen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yih-Mingen_US
dc.contributor.authorYouh, Ru-Yien_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hao-Qianen_US
dc.contributor.authorTang, Pei-Yuen_US
dc.contributor.authorLin, Ming-Hsienen_US
dc.contributor.authorGer, Ming-Deren_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-01T05:22:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-01T05:22:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-01en_US
dc.identifier.issn0042-207Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109382en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11536/154504-
dc.description.abstractThe performances and operation lifetime of field emission (FE) cathodes made by spray-coating three different nanocarbon materials-carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene (GE), and carbon nanocoils (CNCs)-were compared. Though CNTs had the benefits of the lowest turn-on field, CNCs exhibited the most stable cycle-to-cycle repeatability and a significantly longer life than CNTs and GE under a continuous high-current-density operation. The microscopic morphology and Raman spectra of these nanocarbon emitters before and after the 50-h life tests were examined in order to understand the damage mechanism and the cause of their distinct performance decay behaviors. The results indicated that CNCs, whose diameters are significantly larger than those of CNTs and the thickness of GE, can withstand the thermal effects of high current density with the least degree of damage in the morphology and microstructure. According to our performance and life tests, CNTs are most suitable for low-voltage small-current FE applications because of their highest field enhancement factor and lowest turn-on field, while CNCs are a more favorable candidate for high-voltage long-term applications such as FE x-ray tubes.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectField emissionen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.subjectLifeen_US
dc.subjectCarbon nanotubeen_US
dc.subjectCarbon nanocoilen_US
dc.subjectGrapheneen_US
dc.titleComparison of field emission performances and durability of three nanocarbon materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109382en_US
dc.identifier.journalVACUUMen_US
dc.citation.volume177en_US
dc.citation.spage0en_US
dc.citation.epage0en_US
dc.contributor.department交大名義發表zh_TW
dc.contributor.departmentNational Chiao Tung Universityen_US
dc.identifier.wosnumberWOS:000538148400034en_US
dc.citation.woscount0en_US
顯示於類別:期刊論文