Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Abhishek | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Hung, Kuo-Shu | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, Chi-Chuan | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-01T05:22:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-01T05:22:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-05-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/en13092313 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11536/154584 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In the present experimental study, nucleate pool boiling heat transfer measurements of two high-flux tubes (sample A and sample B) were conducted at atmospheric pressure with HFE-7200 as the working fluid. Both high-flux tubes were made from a sintered Cu-Ni (high-flux) alloy powder. The porous high-flux surface was coated inside the test tube and it is tested within the heat flux ranging from 2.6 to 86 kW/m(2). The major difference between sample A and sample B was the coating thickness, where sample B (0.6 mm) was much larger than that of sample A (0.07 mm). Both tubes showed about three times enhancement in heat transfer coefficient (HTC) when compared to plain tube. Even though sample B contained a higher HTC than sample A, it also revealed a faster level-off phenomenon regarding the HTC vs. wall superheat. The major parameter which characterizes the boiling performance of high-flux tube was the ratio of coating thickness to pore diameter which also yielded different trends upon HTC vs. wall superheat amid sample A and B. It was found that the porous based Nishikawa correlation can well predict the performance of sample A but not sample B. This is because the ratio of coating thickness to pore diameter is far outside the applicable range of the Nishikawa correlation. Hence, a modified Nishikawa correlation is proposed. The predicted capability of the proposed modified Nishikawa correlation against sample A and sample for HTC was within +/- 28% deviation. The standard mean deviation of the Nishikawa correlation with experimental data for sample A and sample B was 0.302 (12.48%) and 5.64 (73%), respectively. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | high-flux tube | en_US |
dc.subject | porous surface | en_US |
dc.subject | pool boiling | en_US |
dc.subject | heat transfer coefficient | en_US |
dc.title | Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer from High-Flux Tube with Dielectric Fluid HFE-7200 | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/en13092313 | en_US |
dc.identifier.journal | ENERGIES | en_US |
dc.citation.volume | 13 | en_US |
dc.citation.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.citation.spage | 0 | en_US |
dc.citation.epage | 0 | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | 機械工程學系 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Mechanical Engineering | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosnumber | WOS:000535739300191 | en_US |
dc.citation.woscount | 0 | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |